Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Iceriver KS0

Iceriver KS0

Hashrate 100.0 GH/s Power 65 W Efficiency 650.0 J/TH
VS
Dragonball Miner KS6

Dragonball Miner KS6

Hashrate 11.0 TH/s Power 3,400 W Efficiency 309.1 J/TH

Iceriver KS0 vs Dragonball Miner KS6

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Iceriver KS0 Specification Dragonball Miner KS6
100.0 GH/s Hashrate 11.0 TH/s
65 W Power Consumption 3,400 W
650.0 J/TH Efficiency 309.1 J/TH
Noise Level 75 dB
2.5 kg Weight 14.5 kg
222 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,601 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 36/100
Release Year
KHeavyHash Algorithm KHeavyHash
IceRiver Manufacturer Dragonball

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Iceriver KS0

Daily Revenue 0.00000005 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.16
Daily Profit -$0.15
Monthly -$4.57
Yearly -$55.63

Dragonball Miner KS6

Daily Revenue 0.00000506 BTC $0.40
Daily Electricity -$8.16
Daily Profit -$7.76
Monthly -$232.93
Yearly -$2,834.00

Based on BTC price of $78,153 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Dragonball Miner KS6 wins on 3 of 4 factors (efficiency, hashrate, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 10900% more hashrate (0.1 vs 11.0 TH/s). That said, the Iceriver KS0 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Dragonball Miner KS6 — wins on 3 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Iceriver KS0 and Dragonball Miner KS6 actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Dragonball Miner KS6 10900% more hashrate (0.1 vs 11.0 TH/s)
  • Iceriver KS0 98% better power draw (65.0 vs 3,400.0 W)
  • Dragonball Miner KS6 52% better efficiency (650 vs 309 J/TH)
  • Iceriver KS0 83% better weight (2.5 vs 14.5 kg)
  • Dragonball Miner KS6 5130% more heat output (222 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Iceriver KS0 Metric Dragonball Miner KS6
Upfront cost (MSRP) $3,820
-$0.15 Daily net profit -$7.76
-$56 Net after 1 year -$6,654
-$111 Net after 2 years -$9,488
-$167 Net after 3 years -$12,322
Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Dragonball Miner KS6

309.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Iceriver KS0 vs Dragonball Miner KS6: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KS0 is more profitable at $-0.15/day compared to $-7.76/day for the Dragonball Miner KS6. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Iceriver KS0 vs Dragonball Miner KS6: which runs at a lower noise level?

The Dragonball Miner KS6 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Iceriver KS0 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the Iceriver KS0 or Dragonball Miner KS6?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

What is the efficiency difference between Iceriver KS0 and Dragonball Miner KS6?

The Iceriver KS0 runs at 650.0 J/TH while the Dragonball Miner KS6 runs at 309.1 J/TH — a difference of 340.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 52% better efficiency (650 vs 309 J/TH).