Iceriver AL3 vs Iceriver KS0
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver AL3 | Specification | Iceriver KS0 |
|---|---|---|
| 15.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 100.0 GH/s |
| 3,500 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| 233.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 650.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 16.0 kg | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 222 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver AL3
Iceriver KS0
Based on BTC price of $78,183 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Iceriver AL3, which leads on 3 of 4 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, noise level). The standout gap is 14900% more hashrate (15.0 vs 0.1 TH/s) in the Iceriver AL3's favour. The Iceriver KS0 claws back ground on power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Iceriver AL3 and Iceriver KS0 sit on each measurable spec:
- Iceriver AL3 14900% more hashrate (15.0 vs 0.1 TH/s)
- Iceriver KS0 98% better power draw (3,500.0 vs 65.0 W)
- Iceriver AL3 64% better efficiency (233 vs 650 J/TH)
- Iceriver KS0 84% better weight (16.0 vs 2.5 kg)
- Iceriver AL3 5284% more heat output (11,942 vs 222 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Iceriver AL3 | Metric | Iceriver KS0 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,550 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$7.86 | Daily net profit | -$0.15 |
| -$4,419 | Net after 1 year | -$56 |
| -$7,288 | Net after 2 years | -$111 |
| -$10,157 | Net after 3 years | -$167 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver AL3233.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Iceriver AL3 vs Iceriver KS0: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KS0 is more profitable at $-0.15/day compared to $-7.86/day for the Iceriver AL3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Iceriver AL3 vs Iceriver KS0: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Iceriver AL3 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Iceriver KS0 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Iceriver AL3 vs Iceriver KS0: which fits a residential setup better?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
What is the efficiency difference between Iceriver AL3 and Iceriver KS0?
The Iceriver AL3 runs at 233.3 J/TH while the Iceriver KS0 runs at 650.0 J/TH — a difference of 416.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 64% better efficiency (233 vs 650 J/TH).