Iceriver KS2 vs Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver KS2 | Specification | Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 10.5 TH/s |
| 1,200 W | Power Consumption | 3,600 W |
| 600.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 342.9 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 14.9 kg | Weight | 14.5 kg |
| 4,094 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 12,283 BTU/hr |
| 45/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | Dragonball |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver KS2
Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)
Based on BTC price of $78,234 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T), which leads on 2 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 425% more hashrate (2.0 vs 10.5 TH/s). That said, the Iceriver KS2 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score and price-performance. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Iceriver KS2 and Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) 425% more hashrate (2.0 vs 10.5 TH/s)
- Iceriver KS2 67% better power draw (1,200 vs 3,600 W)
- Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) 43% better efficiency (600 vs 343 J/TH)
- Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) 3% better weight (14.9 vs 14.5 kg)
- Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) 200% more heat output (4,094 vs 12,283 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KS2 50% more home mining score (45.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Iceriver KS2 | Metric | Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) |
|---|---|---|
| $399 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,540 |
| -$2.81 | Daily net profit | -$8.26 |
| -$1,424 | Net after 1 year | -$8,556 |
| -$2,449 | Net after 2 years | -$11,571 |
| -$3,474 | Net after 3 years | -$14,587 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KS2Score: 45/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)342.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Iceriver KS2 or Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KS2 is more profitable at $-2.81/day compared to $-8.26/day for the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Iceriver KS2 or Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Iceriver KS2 vs Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T): which fits a residential setup better?
The Iceriver KS2 scores 45/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Iceriver KS2 and Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)?
The Iceriver KS2 runs at 600.0 J/TH while the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) runs at 342.9 J/TH — a difference of 257.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 43% better efficiency (600 vs 343 J/TH).