Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T

Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T

Hashrate 25.0 TH/s Power 2,050 W Efficiency 82.0 J/TH
VS

MicroBT WhatsMiner M79

Hashrate 920.0 TH/s Power 13,340 W Efficiency 14.5 J/TH

Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M79

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T Specification MicroBT WhatsMiner M79
25.0 TH/s Hashrate 920.0 TH/s
2,050 W Power Consumption 13,340 W
82.0 J/TH Efficiency 14.5 J/TH
Noise Level 50 dB
9,000.0 kg Weight 37.0 kg
6,995 BTU/hr BTU Output 45,516 BTU/hr
26/100 Home Mining Score 44/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Innosilicon Manufacturer MicroBT

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T

Daily Revenue 0.00001150 BTC $0.91
Daily Electricity -$4.92
Daily Profit -$4.01
Monthly -$120.29
Yearly -$1,463.54

MicroBT WhatsMiner M79

Daily Revenue 0.00042337 BTC $33.50
Daily Electricity -$32.02
Daily Profit $1.48
Monthly $44.50
Yearly $541.46

Based on BTC price of $79,126 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the MicroBT WhatsMiner M79 edges it: 4 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 3580% more hashrate (25.0 vs 920.0 TH/s). That said, the Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: MicroBT WhatsMiner M79 — wins on 4 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T and MicroBT WhatsMiner M79 actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • MicroBT WhatsMiner M79 3580% more hashrate (25.0 vs 920.0 TH/s)
  • Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T 85% better power draw (2,050 vs 13,340 W)
  • MicroBT WhatsMiner M79 82% better efficiency (82.0 vs 14.5 J/TH)
  • MicroBT WhatsMiner M79 100% better weight (9,000.0 vs 37.0 kg)
  • MicroBT WhatsMiner M79 551% more heat output (6,995 vs 45,516 BTU/hr)
  • MicroBT WhatsMiner M79 69% more home mining score (26.0 vs 44.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

MicroBT WhatsMiner M79

$5.49/day higher profit at current rates.

Best for Home Mining

MicroBT WhatsMiner M79

Score: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

MicroBT WhatsMiner M79

14.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M79: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the MicroBT WhatsMiner M79 is more profitable at $1.48/day compared to $-4.01/day for the Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M79: which runs at a lower noise level?

The MicroBT WhatsMiner M79 is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M79: which fits a residential setup better?

The MicroBT WhatsMiner M79 scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T and MicroBT WhatsMiner M79?

The Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T runs at 82.0 J/TH while the MicroBT WhatsMiner M79 runs at 14.5 J/TH — a difference of 67.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 82% better efficiency (82.0 vs 14.5 J/TH).