Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

MicroBT Whatsminer M20S

MicroBT Whatsminer M20S

Hashrate 68.0 TH/s Power 3,360 W Efficiency 49.4 J/TH
VS
MicroBT Whatsminer M21S

MicroBT Whatsminer M21S

Hashrate 56.0 TH/s Power 3,360 W Efficiency 60.0 J/TH

MicroBT Whatsminer M20S vs MicroBT Whatsminer M21S

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

MicroBT Whatsminer M20S Specification MicroBT Whatsminer M21S
68.0 TH/s Hashrate 56.0 TH/s
3,360 W Power Consumption 3,360 W
49.4 J/TH Efficiency 60.0 J/TH
Noise Level
12,500.0 kg Weight 12,500.0 kg
11,464 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,464 BTU/hr
22/100 Home Mining Score 22/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
MicroBT Manufacturer MicroBT

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

MicroBT Whatsminer M20S

Daily Revenue 0.00003129 BTC $2.45
Daily Electricity -$8.06
Daily Profit -$5.62
Monthly -$168.57
Yearly -$2,050.88

MicroBT Whatsminer M21S

Daily Revenue 0.00002577 BTC $2.01
Daily Electricity -$8.06
Daily Profit -$6.05
Monthly -$181.51
Yearly -$2,208.37

Based on BTC price of $78,139 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the MicroBT Whatsminer M20S, which leads on 3 of 3 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 18% better efficiency (49.4 vs 60.0 J/TH). Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: MicroBT Whatsminer M20S — wins on 3 of 3 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the MicroBT Whatsminer M20S and MicroBT Whatsminer M21S sit on each measurable spec:

  • MicroBT Whatsminer M20S 21% more hashrate (68.0 vs 56.0 TH/s)
  • MicroBT Whatsminer M20S 18% better efficiency (49.4 vs 60.0 J/TH)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

MicroBT Whatsminer M20S Metric MicroBT Whatsminer M21S
$66 Upfront cost (MSRP) $650
-$5.62 Daily net profit -$6.05
-$2,117 Net after 1 year -$2,858
-$4,168 Net after 2 years -$5,067
-$6,219 Net after 3 years -$7,275
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

MicroBT Whatsminer M20S

49.4 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

MicroBT Whatsminer M20S vs MicroBT Whatsminer M21S: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the MicroBT Whatsminer M20S is more profitable at $-5.62/day compared to $-6.05/day for the MicroBT Whatsminer M21S. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the MicroBT Whatsminer M20S or MicroBT Whatsminer M21S?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the MicroBT Whatsminer M20S or the MicroBT Whatsminer M21S?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

MicroBT Whatsminer M20S vs MicroBT Whatsminer M21S: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The MicroBT Whatsminer M20S runs at 49.4 J/TH while the MicroBT Whatsminer M21S runs at 60.0 J/TH — a difference of 10.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 18% better efficiency (49.4 vs 60.0 J/TH).