MicroBT Whatsminer M3 vs Whatsminer M60S
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| MicroBT Whatsminer M3 | Specification | Whatsminer M60S |
|---|---|---|
| 12.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 186.0 TH/s |
| 2,000 W | Power Consumption | 3,480 W |
| 166.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 18.7 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 8,100.0 kg | Weight | 14.0 kg |
| 6,824 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,874 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| MicroBT | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
MicroBT Whatsminer M3
Whatsminer M60S
Based on BTC price of $79,097 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Whatsminer M60S comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 5 (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 1450% more hashrate (12.0 vs 186.0 TH/s). That said, the MicroBT Whatsminer M3 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The MicroBT Whatsminer M3 and Whatsminer M60S diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Whatsminer M60S 1450% more hashrate (12.0 vs 186.0 TH/s)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M3 43% better power draw (2,000 vs 3,480 W)
- Whatsminer M60S 89% better efficiency (166.7 vs 18.7 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M60S 100% better weight (8,100.0 vs 14.0 kg)
- Whatsminer M60S 74% more heat output (6,824 vs 11,874 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M60S 29% more home mining score (28.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| MicroBT Whatsminer M3 | Metric | Whatsminer M60S |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,500 |
| -$4.36 | Daily net profit | -$1.58 |
| -$1,593 | Net after 1 year | -$6,077 |
| -$3,185 | Net after 2 years | -$6,655 |
| -$4,778 | Net after 3 years | -$7,232 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M60SScore: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M60S18.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
MicroBT Whatsminer M3 vs Whatsminer M60S: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Whatsminer M60S is more profitable at $-1.58/day compared to $-4.36/day for the MicroBT Whatsminer M3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the MicroBT Whatsminer M3 or Whatsminer M60S?
The Whatsminer M60S is quieter at 75 dB compared to the MicroBT Whatsminer M3 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
MicroBT Whatsminer M3 vs Whatsminer M60S: which fits a residential setup better?
The Whatsminer M60S scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the MicroBT Whatsminer M3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between MicroBT Whatsminer M3 and Whatsminer M60S?
The MicroBT Whatsminer M3 runs at 166.7 J/TH while the Whatsminer M60S runs at 18.7 J/TH — a difference of 148.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 89% better efficiency (166.7 vs 18.7 J/TH).