MicroBT Whatsminer M10 vs Whatsminer M60S
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| MicroBT Whatsminer M10 | Specification | Whatsminer M60S |
|---|---|---|
| 33.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 186.0 TH/s |
| 2,145 W | Power Consumption | 3,480 W |
| 65.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 18.7 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 8,550.0 kg | Weight | 14.0 kg |
| 7,319 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,874 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| MicroBT | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
MicroBT Whatsminer M10
Whatsminer M60S
Based on BTC price of $78,165 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Whatsminer M60S comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). The standout gap is 464% more hashrate (33.0 vs 186.0 TH/s) in the Whatsminer M60S's favour. That said, the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 and Whatsminer M60S actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Whatsminer M60S 464% more hashrate (33.0 vs 186.0 TH/s)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M10 38% better power draw (2,145 vs 3,480 W)
- Whatsminer M60S 71% better efficiency (65.0 vs 18.7 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M60S 100% better weight (8,550.0 vs 14.0 kg)
- Whatsminer M60S 62% more heat output (7,319 vs 11,874 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M60S 38% more home mining score (26.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| MicroBT Whatsminer M10 | Metric | Whatsminer M60S |
|---|---|---|
| $2,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,500 |
| -$3.96 | Daily net profit | -$1.66 |
| -$3,946 | Net after 1 year | -$6,106 |
| -$5,392 | Net after 2 years | -$6,713 |
| -$6,837 | Net after 3 years | -$7,319 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M60SScore: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M60S18.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
MicroBT Whatsminer M10 vs Whatsminer M60S: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Whatsminer M60S is more profitable at $-1.66/day compared to $-3.96/day for the MicroBT Whatsminer M10. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 or the Whatsminer M60S better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Whatsminer M60S is quieter at 75 dB compared to the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
MicroBT Whatsminer M10 vs Whatsminer M60S: which fits a residential setup better?
The Whatsminer M60S scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the MicroBT Whatsminer M10). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 and Whatsminer M60S on J/TH?
The MicroBT Whatsminer M10 runs at 65.0 J/TH while the Whatsminer M60S runs at 18.7 J/TH — a difference of 46.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 71% better efficiency (65.0 vs 18.7 J/TH).