Bitmain Antminer S19 XP Hyd (257Th)
Antminer D9 vs Bitmain Antminer S19 XP Hyd (257Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer D9 | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S19 XP Hyd (257Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 1,770.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 257.0 TH/s |
| 2,839 W | Consommation électrique | 5,346 W |
| 1,604.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 20.8 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 16.1 kg | Weight | — |
| 9,687 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 18,241 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 16/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| X11 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer D9
Bitmain Antminer S19 XP Hyd (257Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,244 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP Hyd (257Th) edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 14420% more hashrate (1.8 vs 257.0 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP Hyd (257Th)'s favour. The Antminer D9 claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer D9 and Bitmain Antminer S19 XP Hyd (257Th) sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer S19 XP Hyd (257Th) 14420% more hashrate (1.8 vs 257.0 TH/s)
- Antminer D9 47% better power draw (2,839 vs 5,346 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 XP Hyd (257Th) 99% better efficacité (1,604.0 vs 20.8 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 XP Hyd (257Th) 88% more heat output (9,687 vs 18,241 BTU/hr)
- Antminer D9 125% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 16.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer D9 | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S19 XP Hyd (257Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,059 |
| -$6.75 | Daily net profit | -$3.58 |
| -$5,464 | Net after 1 year | -$2,364 |
| -$7,927 | Net after 2 years | -$3,670 |
| -$10,391 | Net after 3 years | -$4,975 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer D9Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S19 XP Hyd (257Th)20.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer D9 vs Bitmain Antminer S19 XP Hyd (257Th): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP Hyd (257Th) is more profitable at $-3.58/day compared to $-6.75/day for the Antminer D9. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer D9 or Bitmain Antminer S19 XP Hyd (257Th)?
The Antminer D9 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP Hyd (257Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer D9 vs Bitmain Antminer S19 XP Hyd (257Th): which fits a residential setup better?
The Antminer D9 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 16/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP Hyd (257Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer D9 and Bitmain Antminer S19 XP Hyd (257Th)?
The Antminer D9 runs at 1,604.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP Hyd (257Th) runs at 20.8 J/TH — a difference of 1,583.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 99% better efficacité (1,604.0 vs 20.8 J/TH).