Bitmain Antminer S19 XP Hyd (257Th)
Antminer E9 Pro vs Bitmain Antminer S19 XP Hyd (257Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer E9 Pro | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S19 XP Hyd (257Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 3,680.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 257.0 TH/s |
| 2,200 W | Consommation électrique | 5,346 W |
| 597,826.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 20.8 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 14.2 kg | Weight | — |
| 7,506 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 18,241 BTU/hr |
| 40/100 | Home Mining Score | 16/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer E9 Pro
Bitmain Antminer S19 XP Hyd (257Th)
Based on BTC price of $64,221 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP Hyd (257Th) edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 6983596% more hashrate (0.0 vs 257.0 TH/s). The Antminer E9 Pro claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer E9 Pro and Bitmain Antminer S19 XP Hyd (257Th) sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer S19 XP Hyd (257Th) 6983596% more hashrate (0.0 vs 257.0 TH/s)
- Antminer E9 Pro 59% better power draw (2,200 vs 5,346 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 XP Hyd (257Th) 100% better efficacité (597,826.1 vs 20.8 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 XP Hyd (257Th) 143% more heat output (7,506 vs 18,241 BTU/hr)
- Antminer E9 Pro 150% more score de minage domestique (40.0 vs 16.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer E9 Pro | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S19 XP Hyd (257Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,059 |
| -$5.28 | Daily net profit | -$5.36 |
| -$4,927 | Net after 1 year | -$3,017 |
| -$6,854 | Net after 2 years | -$4,974 |
| -$8,781 | Net after 3 years | -$6,932 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer E9 ProScore: 40/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S19 XP Hyd (257Th)20.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer E9 Pro or Bitmain Antminer S19 XP Hyd (257Th) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer E9 Pro is more profitable at $-5.28/day compared to $-5.36/day for the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP Hyd (257Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer E9 Pro or Bitmain Antminer S19 XP Hyd (257Th)?
The Antminer E9 Pro is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP Hyd (257Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer E9 Pro vs Bitmain Antminer S19 XP Hyd (257Th): which fits a residential setup better?
The Antminer E9 Pro scores 40/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 16/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP Hyd (257Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer E9 Pro and Bitmain Antminer S19 XP Hyd (257Th)?
The Antminer E9 Pro runs at 597,826.1 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP Hyd (257Th) runs at 20.8 J/TH — a difference of 597,805.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (597,826.1 vs 20.8 J/TH).