Antminer E9 Pro vs iPollo V2H
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer E9 Pro | Specification | iPollo V2H |
|---|---|---|
| 3,680.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 3.4 GH/s |
| 2,200 W | Consommation électrique | 475 W |
| 597,826.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 139,705.9 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 65 dB |
| 14.2 kg | Weight | 7.9 kg |
| 7,506 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,621 BTU/hr |
| 40/100 | Home Mining Score | 55/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | EtHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer E9 Pro
iPollo V2H
Based on BTC price of $78,186 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le iPollo V2H l'emporte sur 5 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 78% better power draw (2,200 vs 475 W). Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer E9 Pro and iPollo V2H sit on each measurable spec:
- Antminer E9 Pro 8% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V2H 78% better power draw (2,200 vs 475 W)
- iPollo V2H 77% better efficacité (597,826 vs 139,706 J/TH)
- iPollo V2H 13% better noise (75.0 vs 65.0 dB)
- iPollo V2H 44% better weight (14.2 vs 7.9 kg)
- Antminer E9 Pro 363% more heat output (7,506 vs 1,621 BTU/hr)
- iPollo V2H 38% more score de minage domestique (40.0 vs 55.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer E9 Pro | Metric | iPollo V2H |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,850 |
| -$5.28 | Daily net profit | -$1.14 |
| -$4,927 | Net after 1 year | -$2,266 |
| -$6,854 | Net after 2 years | -$2,682 |
| -$8,781 | Net after 3 years | -$3,098 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iPollo V2HScore: 55/100. 65 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iPollo V2H139,705.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer E9 Pro or the iPollo V2H?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V2H is more profitable at $-1.14/day compared to $-5.28/day for the Antminer E9 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer E9 Pro vs iPollo V2H: which runs at a lower noise level?
The iPollo V2H is quieter at 65 dB compared to the Antminer E9 Pro at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer E9 Pro vs iPollo V2H: which fits a residential setup better?
The iPollo V2H scores 55/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 40/100 for the Antminer E9 Pro). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer E9 Pro and iPollo V2H?
The Antminer E9 Pro runs at 597,826.1 J/TH while the iPollo V2H runs at 139,705.9 J/TH — a difference of 458,120.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 77% better efficacité (597,826 vs 139,706 J/TH).