Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) vs IceRiver KS5L
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) | Specification | IceRiver KS5L |
|---|---|---|
| 20.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 12.0 TH/s |
| 3,000 W | Consommation électrique | 3,400 W |
| 150.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 283.3 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 15.8 kg | Weight | 15.0 kg |
| 10,236 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th)
IceRiver KS5L
Based on BTC price of $63,093 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th), which leads on 4 of 4 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 47% better efficacité (150 vs 283 J/TH). Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) and IceRiver KS5L diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) 67% more hashrate (20.0 vs 12.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) 12% better power draw (3,000 vs 3,400 W)
- Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) 47% better efficacité (150 vs 283 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS5L 5% better weight (15.8 vs 15.0 kg)
- IceRiver KS5L 13% more heat output (10,236 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) | Metric | IceRiver KS5L |
|---|---|---|
| $799 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $12,000 |
| -$6.63 | Daily net profit | -$7.82 |
| -$3,219 | Net after 1 year | -$14,853 |
| -$5,638 | Net after 2 years | -$17,707 |
| -$8,058 | Net after 3 years | -$20,560 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th)150.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) vs IceRiver KS5L: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) is more profitable at $-6.63/day compared to $-7.82/day for the IceRiver KS5L. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) or the IceRiver KS5L better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) or IceRiver KS5L?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) vs IceRiver KS5L: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) runs at 150.0 J/TH while the IceRiver KS5L runs at 283.3 J/TH — a difference of 133.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 47% better efficacité (150 vs 283 J/TH).