Antminer S19 Hydro vs Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer S19 Hydro | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 158.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 13.5 TH/s |
| 5,451 W | Consommation électrique | 1,310 W |
| 34.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 97.0 J/TH |
| 50 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 15.2 kg | Weight | 4,200.0 kg |
| 18,599 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,470 BTU/hr |
| 44/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer S19 Hydro
Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th)
Based on BTC price of $76,901 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Antminer S19 Hydro comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 1070% more hashrate (158.0 vs 13.5 TH/s) in the Antminer S19 Hydro's favour. That said, the Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer S19 Hydro and Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Antminer S19 Hydro 1070% more hashrate (158.0 vs 13.5 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) 76% better power draw (5,451 vs 1,310 W)
- Antminer S19 Hydro 64% better efficacité (34.5 vs 97.0 J/TH)
- Antminer S19 Hydro 100% better weight (15.2 vs 4,200.0 kg)
- Antminer S19 Hydro 316% more heat output (18,599 vs 4,470 BTU/hr)
- Antminer S19 Hydro 42% more score de minage domestique (44.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer S19 Hydro | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $5,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $600 |
| -$7.49 | Daily net profit | -$2.67 |
| -$7,734 | Net after 1 year | -$1,573 |
| -$10,468 | Net after 2 years | -$2,546 |
| -$13,203 | Net after 3 years | -$3,520 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer S19 HydroScore: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer S19 Hydro34.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer S19 Hydro or Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) is more profitable at $-2.67/day compared to $-7.49/day for the Antminer S19 Hydro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer S19 Hydro or the Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Antminer S19 Hydro is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer S19 Hydro vs Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th): which fits a residential setup better?
The Antminer S19 Hydro scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer S19 Hydro and Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th)?
The Antminer S19 Hydro runs at 34.5 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) runs at 97.0 J/TH — a difference of 62.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 64% better efficacité (34.5 vs 97.0 J/TH).