Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) vs FluMiner T3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) | Specification | FluMiner T3 |
|---|---|---|
| 13.5 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 115.0 TH/s |
| 1,310 W | Consommation électrique | 1,700 W |
| 97.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 14.8 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 50 dB |
| 4,200.0 kg | Weight | 12.6 kg |
| 4,470 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 5,800 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 56/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | FluMiner |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th)
FluMiner T3
Based on BTC price of $76,901 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the FluMiner T3 edges it: 5 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 752% more hashrate (13.5 vs 115.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) claws back ground on consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) and FluMiner T3 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- FluMiner T3 752% more hashrate (13.5 vs 115.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) 23% better power draw (1,310 vs 1,700 W)
- FluMiner T3 85% better efficacité (97.0 vs 14.8 J/TH)
- FluMiner T3 100% better weight (4,200.0 vs 12.6 kg)
- FluMiner T3 30% more heat output (4,470 vs 5,800 BTU/hr)
- FluMiner T3 81% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 56.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) | Metric | FluMiner T3 |
|---|---|---|
| $600 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,601 |
| -$2.67 | Daily net profit | -$0.01 |
| -$1,573 | Net after 1 year | -$1,605 |
| -$2,546 | Net after 2 years | -$1,608 |
| -$3,520 | Net after 3 years | -$1,612 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
FluMiner T3Score: 56/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
FluMiner T314.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) or the FluMiner T3?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the FluMiner T3 is more profitable at $-0.01/day compared to $-2.67/day for the Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) or the FluMiner T3 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The FluMiner T3 is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) or FluMiner T3?
The FluMiner T3 scores 56/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) vs FluMiner T3: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer S9k (13.5Th) runs at 97.0 J/TH while the FluMiner T3 runs at 14.8 J/TH — a difference of 82.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 85% better efficacité (97.0 vs 14.8 J/TH).