Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) vs Canaan AvalonMiner 841
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) | Specification | Canaan AvalonMiner 841 |
|---|---|---|
| 64.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 13.6 TH/s |
| 3,200 W | Consommation électrique | 1,290 W |
| 50.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 94.9 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 10.0 kg | Weight | 4.7 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,402 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th)
Canaan AvalonMiner 841
Based on BTC price of $73,512 and current network difficulty as of May 30, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 4 (efficacité, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 371% more hashrate (64.0 vs 13.6 TH/s). The Canaan AvalonMiner 841 claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) and Canaan AvalonMiner 841 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) 371% more hashrate (64.0 vs 13.6 TH/s)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 841 60% better power draw (3,200 vs 1,290 W)
- Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) 47% better efficacité (50.0 vs 94.9 J/TH)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 841 53% better weight (10.0 vs 4.7 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) 148% more heat output (10,918 vs 4,402 BTU/hr)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 841 41% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) | Metric | Canaan AvalonMiner 841 |
|---|---|---|
| $75 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$5.55 | Daily net profit | -$2.64 |
| -$2,101 | Net after 1 year | -$965 |
| -$4,128 | Net after 2 years | -$1,930 |
| -$6,154 | Net after 3 years | -$2,895 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan AvalonMiner 841Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th)50.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) or Canaan AvalonMiner 841 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan AvalonMiner 841 is more profitable at $-2.64/day compared to $-5.55/day for the Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) or Canaan AvalonMiner 841?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) or Canaan AvalonMiner 841?
The Canaan AvalonMiner 841 scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) vs Canaan AvalonMiner 841: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) runs at 50.0 J/TH while the Canaan AvalonMiner 841 runs at 94.9 J/TH — a difference of 44.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 47% better efficacité (50.0 vs 94.9 J/TH).