Antminer KS3 vs Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer KS3 | Specification | Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 9.4 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 64.0 TH/s |
| 3,500 W | Consommation électrique | 3,200 W |
| 372.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 50.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 16.1 kg | Weight | 10.0 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,918 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer KS3
Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th)
Based on BTC price of $73,543 and current network difficulty as of May 30, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 87% better efficacité (372.3 vs 50.0 J/TH) in the Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th)'s favour. The Antminer KS3 claws back ground on score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer KS3 and Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) 581% more hashrate (9.4 vs 64.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) 9% better power draw (3,500 vs 3,200 W)
- Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) 87% better efficacité (372.3 vs 50.0 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) 38% better weight (16.1 vs 10.0 kg)
- Antminer KS3 9% more heat output (11,942 vs 10,918 BTU/hr)
- Antminer KS3 64% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer KS3 | Metric | Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $8,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $75 |
| -$8.09 | Daily net profit | -$5.55 |
| -$10,952 | Net after 1 year | -$2,101 |
| -$13,904 | Net after 2 years | -$4,127 |
| -$16,856 | Net after 3 years | -$6,153 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer KS3Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th)50.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer KS3 vs Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) is more profitable at $-5.55/day compared to $-8.09/day for the Antminer KS3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer KS3 or the Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Antminer KS3 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer KS3 or the Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th)?
The Antminer KS3 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer KS3 vs Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer KS3 runs at 372.3 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) runs at 50.0 J/TH — a difference of 322.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 87% better efficacité (372.3 vs 50.0 J/TH).