Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) vs NerdAxe
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) | Specification | NerdAxe |
|---|---|---|
| 10.5 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 500.0 GH/s |
| 1,432 W | Consommation électrique | 12 W |
| 136.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 24.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 30 dB |
| 4.2 kg | Weight | 0.2 kg |
| 4,886 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 41 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 70/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th)
NerdAxe
Based on BTC price of $64,000 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the NerdAxe comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 99% better power draw (1,432.0 vs 12.0 W). The Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) holds the edge in hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) and NerdAxe actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) 2000% more hashrate (10.5 vs 0.5 TH/s)
- NerdAxe 99% better power draw (1,432.0 vs 12.0 W)
- NerdAxe 82% better efficacité (136.4 vs 24.0 J/TH)
- NerdAxe 95% better weight (4.2 vs 0.2 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) 11846% more heat output (4,886.0 vs 40.9 BTU/hr)
- NerdAxe 126% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 70.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) | Metric | NerdAxe |
|---|---|---|
| $955 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $69 |
| -$3.13 | Daily net profit | -$0.01 |
| -$2,098 | Net after 1 year | -$74 |
| -$3,242 | Net after 2 years | -$79 |
| -$4,385 | Net after 3 years | -$85 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
NerdAxeScore: 70/100. 30 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
NerdAxe24.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) vs NerdAxe: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the NerdAxe is more profitable at $-0.01/day compared to $-3.13/day for the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) or the NerdAxe better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The NerdAxe is quieter at 30 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) or the NerdAxe?
The NerdAxe scores 70/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) and NerdAxe on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) runs at 136.4 J/TH while the NerdAxe runs at 24.0 J/TH — a difference of 112.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 82% better efficacité (136.4 vs 24.0 J/TH).