Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Whatsminer M60
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Auradine Teraflux AT2880 | Specification | Whatsminer M60 |
|---|---|---|
| 260.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 170.0 TH/s |
| 4,420 W | Consommation électrique | 3,383 W |
| 17.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 19.9 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| — | Weight | 13.5 kg |
| 15,081 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,543 BTU/hr |
| — | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Auradine | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Auradine Teraflux AT2880
Whatsminer M60
Based on BTC price of $75,831 and current network difficulty as of May 27, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 edges it: 2 of 4 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 53% more hashrate (260 vs 170 TH/s). That said, the Whatsminer M60 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 and Whatsminer M60 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 53% more hashrate (260 vs 170 TH/s)
- Whatsminer M60 23% better power draw (4,420 vs 3,383 W)
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 15% better efficacité (17.0 vs 19.9 J/TH)
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 31% more heat output (15,081 vs 11,543 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Auradine Teraflux AT2880 | Metric | Whatsminer M60 |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $4,800 |
| -$1.54 | Daily net profit | -$2.19 |
| -$560 | Net after 1 year | -$5,598 |
| -$1,121 | Net after 2 years | -$6,396 |
| -$1,681 | Net after 3 years | -$7,195 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M60Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Auradine Teraflux AT288017.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 or the Whatsminer M60?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 is more profitable at $-1.54/day compared to $-2.19/day for the Whatsminer M60. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 or Whatsminer M60?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 or the Whatsminer M60?
The Whatsminer M60 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Auradine Teraflux AT2880). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Auradine Teraflux AT2880 and Whatsminer M60?
The Auradine Teraflux AT2880 runs at 17.0 J/TH while the Whatsminer M60 runs at 19.9 J/TH — a difference of 2.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 15% better efficacité (17.0 vs 19.9 J/TH).
Compare Auradine Teraflux AT2880 with...
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Auradine Teraflux AH3880
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Auradine Teraflux AI3680
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Aisen A1 Pro
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9)
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Antminer S17