Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1346 vs Bitaxe Gamma
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1346 | Specification | Bitaxe Gamma |
|---|---|---|
| 110.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 1,200.0 GH/s |
| 3,300 W | Consommation électrique | 15 W |
| 30.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 12.5 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 38 dB |
| 14.1 kg | Weight | 0.3 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 51 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 70/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1346
Bitaxe Gamma
Based on BTC price of $62,980 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitaxe Gamma comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 100% better power draw (3,300.0 vs 15.0 W). That said, the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1346 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1346 and Bitaxe Gamma actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1346 9067% more hashrate (110.0 vs 1.2 TH/s)
- Bitaxe Gamma 100% better power draw (3,300.0 vs 15.0 W)
- Bitaxe Gamma 58% better efficacité (30.0 vs 12.5 J/TH)
- Bitaxe Gamma 98% better weight (14.1 vs 0.3 kg)
- Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1346 21891% more heat output (11,259.6 vs 51.2 BTU/hr)
- Bitaxe Gamma 218% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 70.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1346 | Metric | Bitaxe Gamma |
|---|---|---|
| $496 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $99 |
| -$4.79 | Daily net profit | -$0.00 |
| -$2,243 | Net after 1 year | -$100 |
| -$3,990 | Net after 2 years | -$100 |
| -$5,736 | Net after 3 years | -$101 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitaxe GammaScore: 70/100. 38 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitaxe Gamma12.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1346 vs Bitaxe Gamma: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe Gamma is more profitable at $0.00/day compared to $-4.79/day for the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1346. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1346 vs Bitaxe Gamma: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Bitaxe Gamma is quieter at 38 dB compared to the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1346 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1346 vs Bitaxe Gamma: which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitaxe Gamma scores 70/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1346). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1346 vs Bitaxe Gamma: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1346 runs at 30.0 J/TH while the Bitaxe Gamma runs at 12.5 J/TH — a difference of 17.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 58% better efficacité (30.0 vs 12.5 J/TH).