Bitaxe Gamma vs MicroBT Whatsminer M61
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitaxe Gamma | Specification | MicroBT Whatsminer M61 |
|---|---|---|
| 1,200.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 200.0 TH/s |
| 15 W | Consommation électrique | 3,980 W |
| 12.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 19.9 J/TH |
| 38 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 0.3 kg | Weight | 13.5 kg |
| 51 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 13,580 BTU/hr |
| 70/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Bitaxe Gamma
MicroBT Whatsminer M61
Based on BTC price of $64,000 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitaxe Gamma, which leads on 4 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better power draw (15.0 vs 3,980.0 W). The MicroBT Whatsminer M61 claws back ground on hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Bitaxe Gamma and MicroBT Whatsminer M61 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- MicroBT Whatsminer M61 16567% more hashrate (1.2 vs 200.0 TH/s)
- Bitaxe Gamma 100% better power draw (15.0 vs 3,980.0 W)
- Bitaxe Gamma 37% better efficacité (12.5 vs 19.9 J/TH)
- Bitaxe Gamma 49% better noise (38.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Bitaxe Gamma 98% better weight (0.3 vs 13.5 kg)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M61 26423% more heat output (51.2 vs 13,579.8 BTU/hr)
- Bitaxe Gamma 133% more score de minage domestique (70.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitaxe Gamma | Metric | MicroBT Whatsminer M61 |
|---|---|---|
| $99 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,200 |
| -$0.00 | Daily net profit | -$3.76 |
| -$99 | Net after 1 year | -$3,573 |
| -$100 | Net after 2 years | -$4,946 |
| -$100 | Net after 3 years | -$6,319 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitaxe GammaScore: 70/100. 38 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitaxe Gamma12.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitaxe Gamma vs MicroBT Whatsminer M61: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe Gamma is more profitable at $0.00/day compared to $-3.76/day for the MicroBT Whatsminer M61. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitaxe Gamma or MicroBT Whatsminer M61?
The Bitaxe Gamma is quieter at 38 dB compared to the MicroBT Whatsminer M61 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitaxe Gamma vs MicroBT Whatsminer M61: which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitaxe Gamma scores 70/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the MicroBT Whatsminer M61). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitaxe Gamma and MicroBT Whatsminer M61 on J/TH?
The Bitaxe Gamma runs at 12.5 J/TH while the MicroBT Whatsminer M61 runs at 19.9 J/TH — a difference of 7.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 37% better efficacité (12.5 vs 19.9 J/TH).