iBeLink BM-S1 Max vs Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-S1 Max | Specification | Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 12.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 8.0 TH/s |
| 3,150 W | Consommation électrique | 2,020 W |
| 262.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 252.5 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 55 dB |
| 9.0 kg | Weight | 13.1 kg |
| 10,748 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,892 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 54/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2b-sia | Algorithme | Blake2b-sia |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-S1 Max
Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th)
Based on BTC price of $73,473 and current network difficulty as of May 30, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) edges it: 4 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 36% better power draw (3,150 vs 2,020 W). The iBeLink BM-S1 Max holds the edge in hashrate. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the iBeLink BM-S1 Max and Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- iBeLink BM-S1 Max 50% more hashrate (12.0 vs 8.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) 36% better power draw (3,150 vs 2,020 W)
- Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) 4% better efficacité (263 vs 253 J/TH)
- iBeLink BM-S1 Max 31% better weight (9.0 vs 13.1 kg)
- iBeLink BM-S1 Max 56% more heat output (10,748 vs 6,892 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) 145% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 54.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| iBeLink BM-S1 Max | Metric | Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $899 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$7.16 | Daily net profit | -$4.58 |
| -$3,513 | Net after 1 year | -$1,672 |
| -$6,127 | Net after 2 years | -$3,345 |
| -$8,740 | Net after 3 years | -$5,017 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th)Score: 54/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th)252.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iBeLink BM-S1 Max or Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) is more profitable at $-4.58/day compared to $-7.16/day for the iBeLink BM-S1 Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the iBeLink BM-S1 Max or Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th)?
The Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) is quieter at 55 dB compared to the iBeLink BM-S1 Max at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the iBeLink BM-S1 Max or the Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th)?
The Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) scores 54/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iBeLink BM-S1 Max). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between iBeLink BM-S1 Max and Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th)?
The iBeLink BM-S1 Max runs at 262.5 J/TH while the Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) runs at 252.5 J/TH — a difference of 10.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 4% better efficacité (263 vs 253 J/TH).