Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max | Specification | Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 8.0 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Consommation électrique | 2,020 W |
| 9,166,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 252.5 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | 55 dB |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 13.1 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,892 BTU/hr |
| 50/100 | Home Mining Score | 54/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Blake2b-sia |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max
Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th)
Based on BTC price of $73,537 and current network difficulty as of May 30, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) l'emporte sur 4 des 4 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique). Its biggest concrete edge: 100% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 253 J/TH). Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) 2222122% more hashrate (0.0 vs 8.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) 39% better power draw (3,300 vs 2,020 W)
- Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) 100% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 253 J/TH)
- Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) 3% better weight (13.5 vs 13.1 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max 63% more heat output (11,260 vs 6,892 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) 8% more score de minage domestique (50.0 vs 54.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE Max | Metric | Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $870 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$7.92 | Daily net profit | -$4.58 |
| -$3,761 | Net after 1 year | -$1,672 |
| -$6,652 | Net after 2 years | -$3,345 |
| -$9,542 | Net after 3 years | -$5,017 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th)Score: 54/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th)252.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE Max or Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) is more profitable at $-4.58/day compared to $-7.92/day for the Goldshell AE Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE Max or the Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE Max or the Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th)?
The Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) scores 54/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 50/100 for the Goldshell AE Max). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE Max runs at 9,166,666.7 J/TH while the Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) runs at 252.5 J/TH — a difference of 9,166,414.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 253 J/TH).