iBeLink BM-S3+ vs Goldshell HS3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-S3+ | Specification | Goldshell HS3 |
|---|---|---|
| 25.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 2.0 TH/s |
| 3,400 W | Consommation électrique | 2,000 W |
| 136.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,000.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 14.0 kg | Weight | 7.0 kg |
| 11,601 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,824 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2b-sia | Algorithme | Blake2b-sia |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-S3+
Goldshell HS3
Based on BTC price of $73,473 and current network difficulty as of May 30, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the iBeLink BM-S3+, which leads on 5 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 1150% more hashrate (25.0 vs 2.0 TH/s) in the iBeLink BM-S3+'s favour. That said, the Goldshell HS3 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The iBeLink BM-S3+ and Goldshell HS3 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- iBeLink BM-S3+ 1150% more hashrate (25.0 vs 2.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell HS3 41% better power draw (3,400 vs 2,000 W)
- iBeLink BM-S3+ 86% better efficacité (136 vs 1,000 J/TH)
- Goldshell HS3 50% better weight (14.0 vs 7.0 kg)
- iBeLink BM-S3+ 70% more heat output (11,601 vs 6,824 BTU/hr)
- iBeLink BM-S3+ 29% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| iBeLink BM-S3+ | Metric | Goldshell HS3 |
|---|---|---|
| $3,299 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,100 |
| -$7.33 | Daily net profit | -$4.73 |
| -$5,974 | Net after 1 year | -$2,828 |
| -$8,649 | Net after 2 years | -$4,555 |
| -$11,324 | Net after 3 years | -$6,283 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iBeLink BM-S3+Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink BM-S3+136.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iBeLink BM-S3+ or Goldshell HS3 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell HS3 is more profitable at $-4.73/day compared to $-7.33/day for the iBeLink BM-S3+. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the iBeLink BM-S3+ or Goldshell HS3?
The iBeLink BM-S3+ is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Goldshell HS3 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the iBeLink BM-S3+ or the Goldshell HS3?
The iBeLink BM-S3+ scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Goldshell HS3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between iBeLink BM-S3+ and Goldshell HS3?
The iBeLink BM-S3+ runs at 136.0 J/TH while the Goldshell HS3 runs at 1,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 864.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 86% better efficacité (136 vs 1,000 J/TH).