iBeLink BM-K3 vs iBeLink BM-S3+
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-K3 | Specification | iBeLink BM-S3+ |
|---|---|---|
| 70.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 25.0 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Consommation électrique | 3,400 W |
| 47.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 136.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| — | Weight | 14.0 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2s | Algorithme | Blake2b-sia |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | iBeLink |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-K3
iBeLink BM-S3+
Based on BTC price of $73,537 and current network difficulty as of May 30, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le iBeLink BM-K3 l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 65% better efficacité (47.1 vs 136.0 J/TH). The iBeLink BM-S3+ holds the edge in score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the iBeLink BM-K3 and iBeLink BM-S3+ actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- iBeLink BM-K3 180% more hashrate (70.0 vs 25.0 TH/s)
- iBeLink BM-K3 3% better power draw (3,300 vs 3,400 W)
- iBeLink BM-K3 65% better efficacité (47.1 vs 136.0 J/TH)
- iBeLink BM-S3+ 3% more heat output (11,260 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
- iBeLink BM-S3+ 64% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| iBeLink BM-K3 | Metric | iBeLink BM-S3+ |
|---|---|---|
| $820 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,299 |
| -$5.59 | Daily net profit | -$7.33 |
| -$2,861 | Net after 1 year | -$5,974 |
| -$4,902 | Net after 2 years | -$8,649 |
| -$6,942 | Net after 3 years | -$11,323 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iBeLink BM-S3+Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink BM-K347.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
iBeLink BM-K3 vs iBeLink BM-S3+: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink BM-K3 is more profitable at $-5.59/day compared to $-7.33/day for the iBeLink BM-S3+. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
iBeLink BM-K3 vs iBeLink BM-S3+: which runs at a lower noise level?
The iBeLink BM-S3+ is quieter at 75 dB compared to the iBeLink BM-K3 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the iBeLink BM-K3 or iBeLink BM-S3+?
The iBeLink BM-S3+ scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iBeLink BM-K3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between iBeLink BM-K3 and iBeLink BM-S3+?
The iBeLink BM-K3 runs at 47.1 J/TH while the iBeLink BM-S3+ runs at 136.0 J/TH — a difference of 88.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 65% better efficacité (47.1 vs 136.0 J/TH).