Bitmain CK6-SE vs Goldshell CK-BOX
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain CK6-SE | Specification | Goldshell CK-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| 17.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.1 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Consommation électrique | 215 W |
| 194.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 204.8 J/TH |
| 80 dB | Niveau de bruit | 45 dB |
| 11.5 kg | Weight | 2.0 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 734 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 59/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithme | Eaglesong |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain CK6-SE
Goldshell CK-BOX
Based on BTC price of $63,866 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain CK6-SE comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 5 (efficacité, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 1519% more hashrate (17.0 vs 1.1 TH/s). The Goldshell CK-BOX claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain CK6-SE and Goldshell CK-BOX actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain CK6-SE 1519% more hashrate (17.0 vs 1.1 TH/s)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 93% better power draw (3,300 vs 215 W)
- Bitmain CK6-SE 5% better efficacité (194 vs 205 J/TH)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 44% better noise (80.0 vs 45.0 dB)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 83% better weight (11.5 vs 2.0 kg)
- Bitmain CK6-SE 1435% more heat output (11,260 vs 734 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 103% more score de minage domestique (29.0 vs 59.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain CK6-SE | Metric | Goldshell CK-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $399 |
| -$7.43 | Daily net profit | -$0.49 |
| -$2,712 | Net after 1 year | -$576 |
| -$5,423 | Net after 2 years | -$754 |
| -$8,135 | Net after 3 years | -$931 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell CK-BOXScore: 59/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain CK6-SE194.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain CK6-SE or Goldshell CK-BOX more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell CK-BOX is more profitable at $-0.49/day compared to $-7.43/day for the Bitmain CK6-SE. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain CK6-SE or the Goldshell CK-BOX better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell CK-BOX is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Bitmain CK6-SE at 80 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain CK6-SE vs Goldshell CK-BOX: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell CK-BOX scores 59/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Bitmain CK6-SE). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain CK6-SE and Goldshell CK-BOX?
The Bitmain CK6-SE runs at 194.1 J/TH while the Goldshell CK-BOX runs at 204.8 J/TH — a difference of 10.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 5% better efficacité (194 vs 205 J/TH).