Goldshell CK6 vs Goldshell CK-BOX
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell CK6 | Specification | Goldshell CK-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| 19.3 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.1 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Consommation électrique | 215 W |
| 171.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 204.8 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 45 dB |
| 8.5 kg | Weight | 2.0 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 734 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 59/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithme | Eaglesong |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell CK6
Goldshell CK-BOX
Based on BTC price of $63,866 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Goldshell CK6 l'emporte sur 3 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 1738% more hashrate (19.3 vs 1.1 TH/s) in the Goldshell CK6's favour. The Goldshell CK-BOX holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell CK6 and Goldshell CK-BOX sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell CK6 1738% more hashrate (19.3 vs 1.1 TH/s)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 93% better power draw (3,300 vs 215 W)
- Goldshell CK6 16% better efficacité (171 vs 205 J/TH)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 76% better weight (8.5 vs 2.0 kg)
- Goldshell CK6 1435% more heat output (11,260 vs 734 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 168% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 59.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell CK6 | Metric | Goldshell CK-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| $799 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $399 |
| -$7.36 | Daily net profit | -$0.49 |
| -$3,486 | Net after 1 year | -$576 |
| -$6,174 | Net after 2 years | -$754 |
| -$8,861 | Net after 3 years | -$931 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell CK-BOXScore: 59/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell CK6171.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell CK6 or Goldshell CK-BOX more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell CK-BOX is more profitable at $-0.49/day compared to $-7.36/day for the Goldshell CK6. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell CK6 or the Goldshell CK-BOX better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell CK-BOX is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Goldshell CK6 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell CK6 vs Goldshell CK-BOX: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell CK-BOX scores 59/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell CK6). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell CK6 and Goldshell CK-BOX on J/TH?
The Goldshell CK6 runs at 171.0 J/TH while the Goldshell CK-BOX runs at 204.8 J/TH — a difference of 33.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 16% better efficacité (171 vs 205 J/TH).