Goldshell Mini-DOGE III vs Goldshell Mini-DOGE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell Mini-DOGE III | Specification | Goldshell Mini-DOGE |
|---|---|---|
| 800.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 185.0 MH/s |
| 500 W | Consommation électrique | 233 W |
| 625,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,259,459.5 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 3.2 kg | Weight | 2.0 kg |
| 1,706 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 795 BTU/hr |
| 62/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell Mini-DOGE III
Goldshell Mini-DOGE
Based on BTC price of $62,822 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell Mini-DOGE III comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 5 (efficacité, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 332% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Goldshell Mini-DOGE III's favour. The Goldshell Mini-DOGE claws back ground on consommation électrique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell Mini-DOGE III and Goldshell Mini-DOGE diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE III 332% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE 53% better power draw (500 vs 233 W)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE III 50% better efficacité (625,000 vs 1,259,459 J/TH)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE 38% better weight (3.2 vs 2.0 kg)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE III 115% more heat output (1,706 vs 795 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE III 100% more score de minage domestique (62.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell Mini-DOGE III | Metric | Goldshell Mini-DOGE |
|---|---|---|
| $499 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $298 |
| -$1.20 | Daily net profit | -$0.56 |
| -$937 | Net after 1 year | -$502 |
| -$1,375 | Net after 2 years | -$706 |
| -$1,813 | Net after 3 years | -$910 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell Mini-DOGE IIIScore: 62/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell Mini-DOGE III625,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell Mini-DOGE III or Goldshell Mini-DOGE more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell Mini-DOGE is more profitable at $-0.56/day compared to $-1.20/day for the Goldshell Mini-DOGE III. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell Mini-DOGE III or Goldshell Mini-DOGE?
The Goldshell Mini-DOGE III is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Goldshell Mini-DOGE at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell Mini-DOGE III or the Goldshell Mini-DOGE?
The Goldshell Mini-DOGE III scores 62/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Goldshell Mini-DOGE). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell Mini-DOGE III and Goldshell Mini-DOGE?
The Goldshell Mini-DOGE III runs at 625,000.0 J/TH while the Goldshell Mini-DOGE runs at 1,259,459.5 J/TH — a difference of 634,459.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 50% better efficacité (625,000 vs 1,259,459 J/TH).