Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Goldshell HS BOX II

Goldshell HS BOX II

Taux de hachage 460.0 GH/s Puissance 400 W Efficiency 869.6 J/TH
VS
Goldshell HS6

Goldshell HS6

Taux de hachage 4.3 TH/s Puissance 3,250 W Efficiency 755.8 J/TH

Goldshell HS BOX II vs Goldshell HS6

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Goldshell HS BOX II Specification Goldshell HS6
460.0 GH/s Taux de hachage 4.3 TH/s
400 W Consommation électrique 3,250 W
869.6 J/TH Efficiency 755.8 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
2.0 kg Weight 8.5 kg
1,365 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,089 BTU/hr
34/100 Home Mining Score 22/100
Release Year
Blake2b+sha3 Algorithme Blake2b+sha3
Goldshell Manufacturer Goldshell

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Goldshell HS BOX II

Daily Revenue 0.00000021 BTC $0.01
Daily Electricity -$0.96
Daily Profit -$0.95
Monthly -$28.41
Yearly -$345.62

Goldshell HS6

Daily Revenue 0.00000195 BTC $0.12
Daily Electricity -$7.80
Daily Profit -$7.68
Monthly -$230.32
Yearly -$2,802.28

Based on BTC price of $62,980 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell HS6, which leads on 2 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate). The standout gap is 835% more hashrate (0.5 vs 4.3 TH/s) in the Goldshell HS6's favour. The Goldshell HS BOX II claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Goldshell HS6 — l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell HS BOX II and Goldshell HS6 sit on each measurable spec:

  • Goldshell HS6 835% more hashrate (0.5 vs 4.3 TH/s)
  • Goldshell HS BOX II 88% better power draw (400 vs 3,250 W)
  • Goldshell HS6 13% better efficacité (870 vs 756 J/TH)
  • Goldshell HS BOX II 76% better weight (2.0 vs 8.5 kg)
  • Goldshell HS6 713% more heat output (1,365 vs 11,089 BTU/hr)
  • Goldshell HS BOX II 55% more score de minage domestique (34.0 vs 22.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Goldshell HS BOX II Metric Goldshell HS6
$325 Upfront cost (MSRP) $3,100
-$0.95 Daily net profit -$7.68
-$671 Net after 1 year -$5,902
-$1,017 Net after 2 years -$8,705
-$1,362 Net after 3 years -$11,507
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Goldshell HS BOX II

Score: 34/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Goldshell HS6

755.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Goldshell HS BOX II vs Goldshell HS6: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell HS BOX II is more profitable at $-0.95/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell HS6. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Goldshell HS BOX II vs Goldshell HS6: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell HS BOX II or Goldshell HS6?

The Goldshell HS BOX II scores 34/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell HS6). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Goldshell HS BOX II and Goldshell HS6 on J/TH?

The Goldshell HS BOX II runs at 869.6 J/TH while the Goldshell HS6 runs at 755.8 J/TH — a difference of 113.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 13% better efficacité (870 vs 756 J/TH).