Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh vs Goldshell HS6
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh | Specification | Goldshell HS6 |
|---|---|---|
| 44.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 4.3 TH/s |
| 460 W | Consommation électrique | 3,250 W |
| 10,454,545.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 755.8 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 2.6 kg | Weight | 8.5 kg |
| 1,570 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,089 BTU/hr |
| 69/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Blake2b+sha3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh
Goldshell HS6
Based on BTC price of $64,221 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell HS6, which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 9772627% more hashrate (0.0 vs 4.3 TH/s) in the Goldshell HS6's favour. The Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh and Goldshell HS6 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell HS6 9772627% more hashrate (0.0 vs 4.3 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh 86% better power draw (460 vs 3,250 W)
- Goldshell HS6 100% better efficacité (10,454,545 vs 756 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh 69% better weight (2.6 vs 8.5 kg)
- Goldshell HS6 607% more heat output (1,570 vs 11,089 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh 214% more score de minage domestique (69.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh | Metric | Goldshell HS6 |
|---|---|---|
| $120 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,100 |
| -$1.10 | Daily net profit | -$7.68 |
| -$523 | Net after 1 year | -$5,901 |
| -$926 | Net after 2 years | -$8,703 |
| -$1,329 | Net after 3 years | -$11,504 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44MhScore: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell HS6755.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh vs Goldshell HS6: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh is more profitable at $-1.10/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell HS6. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh vs Goldshell HS6: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell HS6 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh or Goldshell HS6?
The Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell HS6). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh and Goldshell HS6?
The Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh runs at 10,454,545.5 J/TH while the Goldshell HS6 runs at 755.8 J/TH — a difference of 10,453,789.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (10,454,545 vs 756 J/TH).