Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Goldshell HS-BOX

Goldshell HS-BOX

Taux de hachage 235.0 GH/s Puissance 230 W Efficiency 978.7 J/TH
VS
Hummer Miner Mars H1

Hummer Miner Mars H1

Taux de hachage 88.0 GH/s Puissance 2,800 W Efficiency 31,818.2 J/TH

Goldshell HS-BOX vs Hummer Miner Mars H1

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Goldshell HS-BOX Specification Hummer Miner Mars H1
235.0 GH/s Taux de hachage 88.0 GH/s
230 W Consommation électrique 2,800 W
978.7 J/TH Efficiency 31,818.2 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
Weight 21.0 kg
785 BTU/hr BTU Output 9,554 BTU/hr
31/100 Home Mining Score 22/100
Release Year
Blake2b+sha3 Algorithme Blake2b+sha3
Goldshell Manufacturer Hummer Miner

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Goldshell HS-BOX

Daily Revenue 0.00000011 BTC $0.01
Daily Electricity -$0.55
Daily Profit -$0.55
Monthly -$16.36
Yearly -$199.04

Hummer Miner Mars H1

Daily Revenue 0.00000004 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$6.72
Daily Profit -$6.72
Monthly -$201.52
Yearly -$2,451.88

Based on BTC price of $62,980 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Goldshell HS-BOX l'emporte sur 4 des 4 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique). Where it pulls away hardest is 97% better efficacité (979 vs 31,818 J/TH). Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Goldshell HS-BOX — l'emporte sur 4 des 4 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell HS-BOX and Hummer Miner Mars H1 sit on each measurable spec:

  • Goldshell HS-BOX 167% more hashrate (0.2 vs 0.1 TH/s)
  • Goldshell HS-BOX 92% better power draw (230 vs 2,800 W)
  • Goldshell HS-BOX 97% better efficacité (979 vs 31,818 J/TH)
  • Hummer Miner Mars H1 1117% more heat output (785 vs 9,554 BTU/hr)
  • Goldshell HS-BOX 41% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 22.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Goldshell HS-BOX Metric Hummer Miner Mars H1
$99 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$0.55 Daily net profit -$6.72
-$298 Net after 1 year -$2,452
-$497 Net after 2 years -$4,904
-$696 Net after 3 years -$7,356
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Goldshell HS-BOX

Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Goldshell HS-BOX

978.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Goldshell HS-BOX or the Hummer Miner Mars H1?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell HS-BOX is more profitable at $-0.55/day compared to $-6.72/day for the Hummer Miner Mars H1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Goldshell HS-BOX or the Hummer Miner Mars H1 better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell HS-BOX or the Hummer Miner Mars H1?

The Goldshell HS-BOX scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Hummer Miner Mars H1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Goldshell HS-BOX and Hummer Miner Mars H1 on J/TH?

The Goldshell HS-BOX runs at 978.7 J/TH while the Hummer Miner Mars H1 runs at 31,818.2 J/TH — a difference of 30,839.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 97% better efficacité (979 vs 31,818 J/TH).