Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell HS-BOX
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max II | Specification | Goldshell HS-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| 540.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 235.0 GH/s |
| 3,200 W | Consommation électrique | 230 W |
| 5,925,925.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 978.7 J/TH |
| 85 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 12.5 kg | Weight | — |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 785 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Blake2b+sha3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max II
Goldshell HS-BOX
Based on BTC price of $64,353 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell HS-BOX, which leads on 5 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better efficacité (5,925,926 vs 979 J/TH). That said, the Goldshell AE Max II isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell HS-BOX diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell HS-BOX 43419% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.2 TH/s)
- Goldshell HS-BOX 93% better power draw (3,200 vs 230 W)
- Goldshell HS-BOX 100% better efficacité (5,925,926 vs 979 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Max II 1291% more heat output (10,918 vs 785 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell HS-BOX 7% more score de minage domestique (29.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE Max II | Metric | Goldshell HS-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| $1,050 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $99 |
| -$7.68 | Daily net profit | -$0.55 |
| -$3,853 | Net after 1 year | -$298 |
| -$6,656 | Net after 2 years | -$497 |
| -$9,460 | Net after 3 years | -$696 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell HS-BOXScore: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell HS-BOX978.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell HS-BOX: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell HS-BOX is more profitable at $-0.55/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell AE Max II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE Max II or the Goldshell HS-BOX better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell AE Max II is quieter at 85 dB compared to the Goldshell HS-BOX at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell HS-BOX?
The Goldshell HS-BOX scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Goldshell AE Max II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell HS-BOX on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH while the Goldshell HS-BOX runs at 978.7 J/TH — a difference of 5,924,947.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (5,925,926 vs 979 J/TH).