Goldshell HS3-SE vs Goldshell HS5
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell HS3-SE | Specification | Goldshell HS5 |
|---|---|---|
| 930.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 2.7 TH/s |
| 930 W | Consommation électrique | 2,650 W |
| 1,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 981.5 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 7.3 kg | Weight | 8.5 kg |
| 3,173 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 9,042 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2b-sia | Algorithme | Blake2b-sia |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell HS3-SE
Goldshell HS5
Based on BTC price of $73,464 and current network difficulty as of May 30, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell HS5 comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 190% more hashrate (0.9 vs 2.7 TH/s) in the Goldshell HS5's favour. The Goldshell HS3-SE holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell HS3-SE and Goldshell HS5 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell HS5 190% more hashrate (0.9 vs 2.7 TH/s)
- Goldshell HS3-SE 65% better power draw (930 vs 2,650 W)
- Goldshell HS5 2% better efficacité (1,000 vs 981 J/TH)
- Goldshell HS3-SE 14% better weight (7.3 vs 8.5 kg)
- Goldshell HS5 185% more heat output (3,173 vs 9,042 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell HS3-SE 41% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell HS3-SE | Metric | Goldshell HS5 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,700 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $949 |
| -$2.20 | Daily net profit | -$6.27 |
| -$2,503 | Net after 1 year | -$3,238 |
| -$3,307 | Net after 2 years | -$5,526 |
| -$4,110 | Net after 3 years | -$7,815 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell HS3-SEScore: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell HS5981.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell HS3-SE or the Goldshell HS5?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell HS3-SE is more profitable at $-2.20/day compared to $-6.27/day for the Goldshell HS5. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell HS3-SE or Goldshell HS5?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Goldshell HS3-SE vs Goldshell HS5: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell HS3-SE scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell HS5). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell HS3-SE vs Goldshell HS5: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell HS3-SE runs at 1,000.0 J/TH while the Goldshell HS5 runs at 981.5 J/TH — a difference of 18.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 2% better efficacité (1,000 vs 981 J/TH).