Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell HS3-SE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Specification | Goldshell HS3-SE |
|---|---|---|
| 37.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 930.0 GH/s |
| 360 W | Consommation électrique | 930 W |
| 9,729,729.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,000.0 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 2.3 kg | Weight | 7.3 kg |
| 1,228 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 3,173 BTU/hr |
| 69/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Blake2b-sia |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX
Goldshell HS3-SE
Based on BTC price of $73,534 and current network difficulty as of May 30, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Goldshell HS3-SE l'emporte sur 3 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 2513414% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.9 TH/s). The Goldshell AE-BOX claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE-BOX and Goldshell HS3-SE actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell HS3-SE 2513414% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.9 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 61% better power draw (360 vs 930 W)
- Goldshell HS3-SE 100% better efficacité (9,729,730 vs 1,000 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 68% better weight (2.3 vs 7.3 kg)
- Goldshell HS3-SE 158% more heat output (1,228 vs 3,173 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 123% more score de minage domestique (69.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Metric | Goldshell HS3-SE |
|---|---|---|
| $100 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,700 |
| -$0.86 | Daily net profit | -$2.20 |
| -$415 | Net after 1 year | -$2,503 |
| -$731 | Net after 2 years | -$3,307 |
| -$1,046 | Net after 3 years | -$4,110 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOXScore: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell HS3-SE1,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE-BOX or Goldshell HS3-SE more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE-BOX is more profitable at $-0.86/day compared to $-2.20/day for the Goldshell HS3-SE. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell HS3-SE: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE-BOX is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell HS3-SE at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell HS3-SE: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell AE-BOX scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Goldshell HS3-SE). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE-BOX and Goldshell HS3-SE on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE-BOX runs at 9,729,729.7 J/TH while the Goldshell HS3-SE runs at 1,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 9,728,729.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (9,729,730 vs 1,000 J/TH).