Goldshell HS3-SE vs Goldshell SC Box II
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell HS3-SE | Specification | Goldshell SC Box II |
|---|---|---|
| 930.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.9 TH/s |
| 930 W | Consommation électrique | 400 W |
| 1,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 210.5 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 35 dB |
| 7.3 kg | Weight | 2.3 kg |
| 3,173 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,365 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 69/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2b-sia | Algorithme | Blake2b-sia |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell HS3-SE
Goldshell SC Box II
Based on BTC price of $73,512 and current network difficulty as of May 30, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Goldshell SC Box II l'emporte sur 6 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 79% better efficacité (1,000 vs 211 J/TH) in the Goldshell SC Box II's favour. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell HS3-SE and Goldshell SC Box II diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell SC Box II 104% more hashrate (0.9 vs 1.9 TH/s)
- Goldshell SC Box II 57% better power draw (930 vs 400 W)
- Goldshell SC Box II 79% better efficacité (1,000 vs 211 J/TH)
- Goldshell SC Box II 68% better weight (7.3 vs 2.3 kg)
- Goldshell HS3-SE 133% more heat output (3,173 vs 1,365 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell SC Box II 123% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 69.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell HS3-SE | Metric | Goldshell SC Box II |
|---|---|---|
| $1,700 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $379 |
| -$2.20 | Daily net profit | -$0.90 |
| -$2,503 | Net after 1 year | -$706 |
| -$3,307 | Net after 2 years | -$1,034 |
| -$4,110 | Net after 3 years | -$1,361 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell SC Box IIScore: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell SC Box II210.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell HS3-SE or the Goldshell SC Box II?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell SC Box II is more profitable at $-0.90/day compared to $-2.20/day for the Goldshell HS3-SE. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell HS3-SE vs Goldshell SC Box II: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell SC Box II is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell HS3-SE at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell HS3-SE vs Goldshell SC Box II: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell SC Box II scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Goldshell HS3-SE). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell HS3-SE and Goldshell SC Box II on J/TH?
The Goldshell HS3-SE runs at 1,000.0 J/TH while the Goldshell SC Box II runs at 210.5 J/TH — a difference of 789.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 79% better efficacité (1,000 vs 211 J/TH).