Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Goldshell HS3

Goldshell HS3

Taux de hachage 2.0 TH/s Puissance 2,000 W Efficiency 1,000.0 J/TH
VS
Goldshell SC Lite

Goldshell SC Lite

Taux de hachage 4.0 TH/s Puissance 950 W Efficiency 237.5 J/TH

Goldshell HS3 vs Goldshell SC Lite

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Goldshell HS3 Specification Goldshell SC Lite
2.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 4.0 TH/s
2,000 W Consommation électrique 950 W
1,000.0 J/TH Efficiency 237.5 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
7.0 kg Weight 9.5 kg
6,824 BTU/hr BTU Output 3,241 BTU/hr
28/100 Home Mining Score 31/100
Release Year
Blake2b-sia Algorithme Blake2b-sia
Goldshell Manufacturer Goldshell

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Goldshell HS3

Daily Revenue 0.00000090 BTC $0.07
Daily Electricity -$4.80
Daily Profit -$4.73
Monthly -$142.00
Yearly -$1,727.72

Goldshell SC Lite

Daily Revenue 0.00000181 BTC $0.13
Daily Electricity -$2.28
Daily Profit -$2.15
Monthly -$64.41
Yearly -$783.64

Based on BTC price of $73,513 and current network difficulty as of May 30, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Goldshell SC Lite l'emporte sur 5 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 76% better efficacité (1,000 vs 238 J/TH). The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Goldshell SC Lite — l'emporte sur 5 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

The Goldshell HS3 and Goldshell SC Lite diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Goldshell SC Lite 100% more hashrate (2.0 vs 4.0 TH/s)
  • Goldshell SC Lite 53% better power draw (2,000 vs 950 W)
  • Goldshell SC Lite 76% better efficacité (1,000 vs 238 J/TH)
  • Goldshell HS3 26% better weight (7.0 vs 9.5 kg)
  • Goldshell HS3 111% more heat output (6,824 vs 3,241 BTU/hr)
  • Goldshell SC Lite 11% more score de minage domestique (28.0 vs 31.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Goldshell HS3 Metric Goldshell SC Lite
$1,100 Upfront cost (MSRP) $130
-$4.73 Daily net profit -$2.15
-$2,828 Net after 1 year -$914
-$4,555 Net after 2 years -$1,697
-$6,283 Net after 3 years -$2,481
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Goldshell SC Lite

Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Goldshell SC Lite

237.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Goldshell HS3 or the Goldshell SC Lite?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell SC Lite is more profitable at $-2.15/day compared to $-4.73/day for the Goldshell HS3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Goldshell HS3 or Goldshell SC Lite?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell HS3 or Goldshell SC Lite?

The Goldshell SC Lite scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Goldshell HS3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell HS3 and Goldshell SC Lite?

The Goldshell HS3 runs at 1,000.0 J/TH while the Goldshell SC Lite runs at 237.5 J/TH — a difference of 762.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 76% better efficacité (1,000 vs 238 J/TH).