Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell SC Lite
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Specification | Goldshell SC Lite |
|---|---|---|
| 37.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 4.0 TH/s |
| 360 W | Consommation électrique | 950 W |
| 9,729,729.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 237.5 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 2.3 kg | Weight | 9.5 kg |
| 1,228 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 3,241 BTU/hr |
| 69/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Blake2b-sia |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX
Goldshell SC Lite
Based on BTC price of $73,537 and current network difficulty as of May 30, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Goldshell SC Lite l'emporte sur 3 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 10810711% more hashrate (0.0 vs 4.0 TH/s) in the Goldshell SC Lite's favour. The Goldshell AE-BOX holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE-BOX and Goldshell SC Lite diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell SC Lite 10810711% more hashrate (0.0 vs 4.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 62% better power draw (360 vs 950 W)
- Goldshell SC Lite 100% better efficacité (9,729,730 vs 238 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 76% better weight (2.3 vs 9.5 kg)
- Goldshell SC Lite 164% more heat output (1,228 vs 3,241 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 123% more score de minage domestique (69.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Metric | Goldshell SC Lite |
|---|---|---|
| $100 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $130 |
| -$0.86 | Daily net profit | -$2.15 |
| -$415 | Net after 1 year | -$914 |
| -$731 | Net after 2 years | -$1,697 |
| -$1,046 | Net after 3 years | -$2,481 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOXScore: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell SC Lite237.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell SC Lite: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE-BOX is more profitable at $-0.86/day compared to $-2.15/day for the Goldshell SC Lite. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE-BOX or the Goldshell SC Lite better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell AE-BOX is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell SC Lite at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE-BOX or the Goldshell SC Lite?
The Goldshell AE-BOX scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Goldshell SC Lite). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell SC Lite: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE-BOX runs at 9,729,729.7 J/TH while the Goldshell SC Lite runs at 237.5 J/TH — a difference of 9,729,492.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (9,729,730 vs 238 J/TH).