Goldshell HS3 vs Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell HS3 | Specification | Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 8.0 TH/s |
| 2,000 W | Consommation électrique | 2,020 W |
| 1,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 252.5 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 55 dB |
| 7.0 kg | Weight | 13.1 kg |
| 6,824 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,892 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 54/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2b-sia | Algorithme | Blake2b-sia |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell HS3
Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th)
Based on BTC price of $73,513 and current network difficulty as of May 30, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 300% more hashrate (2.0 vs 8.0 TH/s) in the Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th)'s favour. The Goldshell HS3 claws back ground on consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell HS3 and Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) 300% more hashrate (2.0 vs 8.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell HS3 1% better power draw (2,000 vs 2,020 W)
- Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) 75% better efficacité (1,000 vs 253 J/TH)
- Goldshell HS3 47% better weight (7.0 vs 13.1 kg)
- Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) 1% more heat output (6,824 vs 6,892 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) 93% more score de minage domestique (28.0 vs 54.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell HS3 | Metric | Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $1,100 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$4.73 | Daily net profit | -$4.58 |
| -$2,828 | Net after 1 year | -$1,672 |
| -$4,555 | Net after 2 years | -$3,345 |
| -$6,283 | Net after 3 years | -$5,017 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th)Score: 54/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th)252.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell HS3 or the Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) is more profitable at $-4.58/day compared to $-4.73/day for the Goldshell HS3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell HS3 or the Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Goldshell HS3 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell HS3 or Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th)?
The Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) scores 54/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Goldshell HS3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell HS3 vs Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell HS3 runs at 1,000.0 J/TH while the Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) runs at 252.5 J/TH — a difference of 747.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 75% better efficacité (1,000 vs 253 J/TH).