Goldshell SC-BOX vs Goldshell SC5 Pro II
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell SC-BOX | Specification | Goldshell SC5 Pro II |
|---|---|---|
| 900.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 14.0 TH/s |
| 200 W | Consommation électrique | 3,300 W |
| 222.2 J/TH | Efficiency | 235.7 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 2.0 kg | Weight | 11.5 kg |
| 682 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,260 BTU/hr |
| 33/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2b-sia | Algorithme | Blake2b-sia |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell SC-BOX
Goldshell SC5 Pro II
Based on BTC price of $73,473 and current network difficulty as of May 30, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell SC-BOX comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique). Its biggest concrete edge: 94% better power draw (200 vs 3,300 W). The Goldshell SC5 Pro II holds the edge in hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell SC-BOX and Goldshell SC5 Pro II actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell SC5 Pro II 1456% more hashrate (0.9 vs 14.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell SC-BOX 94% better power draw (200 vs 3,300 W)
- Goldshell SC-BOX 6% better efficacité (222 vs 236 J/TH)
- Goldshell SC-BOX 83% better weight (2.0 vs 11.5 kg)
- Goldshell SC5 Pro II 1550% more heat output (682 vs 11,260 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell SC-BOX 50% more score de minage domestique (33.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell SC-BOX | Metric | Goldshell SC5 Pro II |
|---|---|---|
| $299 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $630 |
| -$0.45 | Daily net profit | -$7.45 |
| -$463 | Net after 1 year | -$3,351 |
| -$628 | Net after 2 years | -$6,072 |
| -$792 | Net after 3 years | -$8,793 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell SC-BOXScore: 33/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell SC-BOX222.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell SC-BOX vs Goldshell SC5 Pro II: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell SC-BOX is more profitable at $-0.45/day compared to $-7.45/day for the Goldshell SC5 Pro II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell SC-BOX or Goldshell SC5 Pro II?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell SC-BOX or Goldshell SC5 Pro II?
The Goldshell SC-BOX scores 33/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell SC5 Pro II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell SC-BOX and Goldshell SC5 Pro II on J/TH?
The Goldshell SC-BOX runs at 222.2 J/TH while the Goldshell SC5 Pro II runs at 235.7 J/TH — a difference of 13.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 6% better efficacité (222 vs 236 J/TH).