Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh vs Goldshell SC-BOX
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh | Specification | Goldshell SC-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| 44.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 900.0 GH/s |
| 460 W | Consommation électrique | 200 W |
| 10,454,545.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 222.2 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 2.6 kg | Weight | 2.0 kg |
| 1,570 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 682 BTU/hr |
| 69/100 | Home Mining Score | 33/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Blake2b-sia |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh
Goldshell SC-BOX
Based on BTC price of $73,537 and current network difficulty as of May 30, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell SC-BOX edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better efficacité (10,454,545 vs 222 J/TH). That said, the Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh and Goldshell SC-BOX actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell SC-BOX 2045355% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.9 TH/s)
- Goldshell SC-BOX 57% better power draw (460 vs 200 W)
- Goldshell SC-BOX 100% better efficacité (10,454,545 vs 222 J/TH)
- Goldshell SC-BOX 23% better weight (2.6 vs 2.0 kg)
- Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh 130% more heat output (1,570 vs 682 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh 109% more score de minage domestique (69.0 vs 33.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh | Metric | Goldshell SC-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| $120 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $299 |
| -$1.10 | Daily net profit | -$0.45 |
| -$523 | Net after 1 year | -$463 |
| -$926 | Net after 2 years | -$628 |
| -$1,329 | Net after 3 years | -$792 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44MhScore: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell SC-BOX222.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh or the Goldshell SC-BOX?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell SC-BOX is more profitable at $-0.45/day compared to $-1.10/day for the Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh or the Goldshell SC-BOX better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell SC-BOX at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh or Goldshell SC-BOX?
The Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 33/100 for the Goldshell SC-BOX). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh and Goldshell SC-BOX?
The Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh runs at 10,454,545.5 J/TH while the Goldshell SC-BOX runs at 222.2 J/TH — a difference of 10,454,323.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (10,454,545 vs 222 J/TH).