MicroBT Whatsminer M10 vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| MicroBT Whatsminer M10 | Specification | MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+ |
|---|---|---|
| 33.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 262.0 TH/s |
| 2,145 W | Consommation électrique | 3,275 W |
| 65.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 12.5 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 8,550.0 kg | Weight | 13.5 kg |
| 7,319 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,174 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| MicroBT | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
MicroBT Whatsminer M10
MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+
Based on BTC price of $78,143 and current network difficulty as of May 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+, which leads on 4 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 694% more hashrate (33.0 vs 262.0 TH/s) in the MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+'s favour. The MicroBT Whatsminer M10 holds the edge in consommation électrique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The MicroBT Whatsminer M10 and MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+ diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+ 694% more hashrate (33.0 vs 262.0 TH/s)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M10 35% better power draw (2,145 vs 3,275 W)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+ 81% better efficacité (65.0 vs 12.5 J/TH)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+ 100% better weight (8,550.0 vs 13.5 kg)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+ 53% more heat output (7,319 vs 11,174 BTU/hr)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+ 38% more score de minage domestique (26.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| MicroBT Whatsminer M10 | Metric | MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+ |
|---|---|---|
| $2,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$3.96 | Daily net profit | $1.56 |
| -$3,946 | Net after 1 year | +$570 |
| -$5,392 | Net after 2 years | +$1,140 |
| -$6,838 | Net after 3 years | +$1,710 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+$5.52/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+12.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
MicroBT Whatsminer M10 vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+ is more profitable at $1.56/day compared to $-3.96/day for the MicroBT Whatsminer M10. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 or MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+?
The MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+ is quieter at 75 dB compared to the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
MicroBT Whatsminer M10 vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+: which fits a residential setup better?
The MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+ scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the MicroBT Whatsminer M10). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
MicroBT Whatsminer M10 vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The MicroBT Whatsminer M10 runs at 65.0 J/TH while the MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+ runs at 12.5 J/TH — a difference of 52.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 81% better efficacité (65.0 vs 12.5 J/TH).