MicroBT Whatsminer M10S vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Quick verdict
For most buyers the MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+ is the stronger pick — it leads on 4 of 4 head-to-head factors. The MicroBT Whatsminer M10S runs 55.0 TH/s at 63.6 J/TH; the MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+ runs 262.0 TH/s at 12.5 J/TH.
Specs verified against the D-Central Mining Bible \xc2\xb7 June 2026
Specifications Comparison
| MicroBT Whatsminer M10S | Specification | MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+ |
|---|---|---|
| 55.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 262.0 TH/s |
| 3,500 W | Consommation électrique | 3,275 W |
| 63.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 12.5 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 10.7 kg | Weight | 13.5 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,174 BTU/hr |
| 8/100 | Home Mining Score | 8/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| MicroBT | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
MicroBT Whatsminer M10S
MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+
Based on BTC price of $63,796 and current network difficulty as of Jun 13, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+ l'emporte sur 4 des 4 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 80% better efficacité (63.6 vs 12.5 J/TH). Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S and MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+ sit on each measurable spec:
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+ 376% more hashrate (55.0 vs 262.0 TH/s)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+ 6% better power draw (3,500 vs 3,275 W)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+ 80% better efficacité (63.6 vs 12.5 J/TH)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M10S 21% better weight (10.7 vs 13.5 kg)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M10S 7% more heat output (11,942 vs 11,174 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| MicroBT Whatsminer M10S | Metric | MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+ |
|---|---|---|
| $3,800 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$6.81 | Daily net profit | -$0.30 |
| -$6,287 | Net after 1 year | -$109 |
| -$8,773 | Net after 2 years | -$218 |
| -$11,260 | Net after 3 years | -$327 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+12.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Foire aux questions
Which makes more money, the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S or the MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+ is more profitable at $-0.30/day compared to $-6.81/day for the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S or the MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+ better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+ is quieter at 75 dB compared to the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S or MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
MicroBT Whatsminer M10S vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The MicroBT Whatsminer M10S runs at 63.6 J/TH while the MicroBT WhatsMiner M70S+ runs at 12.5 J/TH — a difference of 51.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 80% better efficacité (63.6 vs 12.5 J/TH).