Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

MicroBT Whatsminer M21S

MicroBT Whatsminer M21S

Taux de hachage 56.0 TH/s Puissance 3,360 W Efficiency 60.0 J/TH
VS
MicroBT Whatsminer M32

MicroBT Whatsminer M32

Taux de hachage 62.0 TH/s Puissance 3,348 W Efficiency 54.0 J/TH

MicroBT Whatsminer M21S vs MicroBT Whatsminer M32

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

MicroBT Whatsminer M21S Specification MicroBT Whatsminer M32
56.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 62.0 TH/s
3,360 W Consommation électrique 3,348 W
60.0 J/TH Efficiency 54.0 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
12.5 kg Weight
11,464 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,423 BTU/hr
22/100 Home Mining Score 22/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
MicroBT Manufacturer MicroBT

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

MicroBT Whatsminer M21S

Daily Revenue 0.00002533 BTC $1.63
Daily Electricity -$8.06
Daily Profit -$6.43
Monthly -$193.02
Yearly -$2,348.40

MicroBT Whatsminer M32

Daily Revenue 0.00002805 BTC $1.80
Daily Electricity -$8.04
Daily Profit -$6.23
Monthly -$186.92
Yearly -$2,274.14

Based on BTC price of $64,340 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le MicroBT Whatsminer M32 l'emporte sur 3 des 4 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique). Where it pulls away hardest is 10% better efficacité (60.0 vs 54.0 J/TH). That said, the MicroBT Whatsminer M21S isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: MicroBT Whatsminer M32 — l'emporte sur 3 des 4 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the MicroBT Whatsminer M21S and MicroBT Whatsminer M32 sit on each measurable spec:

  • MicroBT Whatsminer M32 11% more hashrate (56.0 vs 62.0 TH/s)
  • MicroBT Whatsminer M32 10% better efficacité (60.0 vs 54.0 J/TH)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

MicroBT Whatsminer M21S Metric MicroBT Whatsminer M32
$650 Upfront cost (MSRP) $5,105
-$6.43 Daily net profit -$6.23
-$2,998 Net after 1 year -$7,379
-$5,347 Net after 2 years -$9,653
-$7,695 Net after 3 years -$11,927
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

MicroBT Whatsminer M32

54.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the MicroBT Whatsminer M21S or MicroBT Whatsminer M32 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the MicroBT Whatsminer M32 is more profitable at $-6.23/day compared to $-6.43/day for the MicroBT Whatsminer M21S. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the MicroBT Whatsminer M21S or MicroBT Whatsminer M32?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the MicroBT Whatsminer M21S or the MicroBT Whatsminer M32?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

MicroBT Whatsminer M21S vs MicroBT Whatsminer M32: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The MicroBT Whatsminer M21S runs at 60.0 J/TH while the MicroBT Whatsminer M32 runs at 54.0 J/TH — a difference of 6.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 10% better efficacité (60.0 vs 54.0 J/TH).