Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

MicroBT Whatsminer M10S

MicroBT Whatsminer M10S

Taux de hachage 55.0 TH/s Puissance 3,500 W Efficiency 63.6 J/TH
VS
MicroBT Whatsminer M32

MicroBT Whatsminer M32

Taux de hachage 62.0 TH/s Puissance 3,348 W Efficiency 54.0 J/TH

MicroBT Whatsminer M10S vs MicroBT Whatsminer M32

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

MicroBT Whatsminer M10S Specification MicroBT Whatsminer M32
55.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 62.0 TH/s
3,500 W Consommation électrique 3,348 W
63.6 J/TH Efficiency 54.0 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
10.7 kg Weight
11,942 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,423 BTU/hr
22/100 Home Mining Score 22/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
MicroBT Manufacturer MicroBT

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

MicroBT Whatsminer M10S

Daily Revenue 0.00002488 BTC $1.60
Daily Electricity -$8.40
Daily Profit -$6.80
Monthly -$203.97
Yearly -$2,481.66

MicroBT Whatsminer M32

Daily Revenue 0.00002805 BTC $1.80
Daily Electricity -$8.04
Daily Profit -$6.23
Monthly -$186.92
Yearly -$2,274.14

Based on BTC price of $64,340 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the MicroBT Whatsminer M32 comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 4 (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique). Where it pulls away hardest is 15% better efficacité (63.6 vs 54.0 J/TH). The MicroBT Whatsminer M10S claws back ground on rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: MicroBT Whatsminer M32 — l'emporte sur 3 des 4 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S and MicroBT Whatsminer M32 actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • MicroBT Whatsminer M32 13% more hashrate (55.0 vs 62.0 TH/s)
  • MicroBT Whatsminer M32 4% better power draw (3,500 vs 3,348 W)
  • MicroBT Whatsminer M32 15% better efficacité (63.6 vs 54.0 J/TH)
  • MicroBT Whatsminer M10S 5% more heat output (11,942 vs 11,423 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

MicroBT Whatsminer M10S Metric MicroBT Whatsminer M32
$3,800 Upfront cost (MSRP) $5,105
-$6.80 Daily net profit -$6.23
-$6,282 Net after 1 year -$7,379
-$8,763 Net after 2 years -$9,653
-$11,245 Net after 3 years -$11,927
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

MicroBT Whatsminer M32

54.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S or MicroBT Whatsminer M32 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the MicroBT Whatsminer M32 is more profitable at $-6.23/day compared to $-6.80/day for the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S or the MicroBT Whatsminer M32 better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S or the MicroBT Whatsminer M32?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

MicroBT Whatsminer M10S vs MicroBT Whatsminer M32: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The MicroBT Whatsminer M10S runs at 63.6 J/TH while the MicroBT Whatsminer M32 runs at 54.0 J/TH — a difference of 9.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 15% better efficacité (63.6 vs 54.0 J/TH).