MicroBT Whatsminer M61 vs Whatsminer M63S
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| MicroBT Whatsminer M61 | Specification | Whatsminer M63S |
|---|---|---|
| 200.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 390.0 TH/s |
| 3,980 W | Consommation électrique | 7,215 W |
| 19.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 18.5 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 50 dB |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 28.0 kg |
| 13,580 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 24,618 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 44/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| MicroBT | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
MicroBT Whatsminer M61
Whatsminer M63S
Based on BTC price of $63,866 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Whatsminer M63S l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 95% more hashrate (200 vs 390 TH/s). That said, the MicroBT Whatsminer M61 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The MicroBT Whatsminer M61 and Whatsminer M63S diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Whatsminer M63S 95% more hashrate (200 vs 390 TH/s)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M61 45% better power draw (3,980 vs 7,215 W)
- Whatsminer M63S 7% better efficacité (19.9 vs 18.5 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M63S 33% better noise (75.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M61 52% better weight (13.5 vs 28.0 kg)
- Whatsminer M63S 81% more heat output (13,580 vs 24,618 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M63S 47% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 44.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| MicroBT Whatsminer M61 | Metric | Whatsminer M63S |
|---|---|---|
| $2,200 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $12,000 |
| -$3.77 | Daily net profit | -$6.05 |
| -$3,577 | Net after 1 year | -$14,207 |
| -$4,955 | Net after 2 years | -$16,415 |
| -$6,332 | Net after 3 years | -$18,622 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M63SScore: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M63S18.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
MicroBT Whatsminer M61 vs Whatsminer M63S: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the MicroBT Whatsminer M61 is more profitable at $-3.77/day compared to $-6.05/day for the Whatsminer M63S. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the MicroBT Whatsminer M61 or the Whatsminer M63S better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Whatsminer M63S is quieter at 50 dB compared to the MicroBT Whatsminer M61 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the MicroBT Whatsminer M61 or Whatsminer M63S?
The Whatsminer M63S scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the MicroBT Whatsminer M61). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
MicroBT Whatsminer M61 vs Whatsminer M63S: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The MicroBT Whatsminer M61 runs at 19.9 J/TH while the Whatsminer M63S runs at 18.5 J/TH — a difference of 1.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 7% better efficacité (19.9 vs 18.5 J/TH).