Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Innosilicon A4 Dominator

Innosilicon A4 Dominator

Hashrate 280.0 MH/s Power 1,050 W Efficiency 3,750,000.0 J/TH
VS
Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+

Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+

Hashrate 33.0 TH/s Power 2,600 W Efficiency 78.8 J/TH

Innosilicon A4 Dominator vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Innosilicon A4 Dominator Specification Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+
280.0 MH/s Hashrate 33.0 TH/s
1,050 W Power Consumption 2,600 W
3,750,000.0 J/TH Efficiency 78.8 J/TH
Noise Level
9,200.0 kg Weight 10,000.0 kg
3,583 BTU/hr BTU Output 8,871 BTU/hr
31/100 Home Mining Score 22/100
Release Year
Scrypt Algorithm SHA-256
Innosilicon Manufacturer Innosilicon

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Innosilicon A4 Dominator

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$2.52
Daily Profit -$2.52
Monthly -$75.60
Yearly -$919.80

Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+

Daily Revenue 0.00001519 BTC $1.20
Daily Electricity -$6.24
Daily Profit -$5.04
Monthly -$151.20
Yearly -$1,839.56

Based on BTC price of $79,027 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ wins on 2 of 4 factors (efficiency, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 11785614% more hashrate (0.0 vs 33.0 TH/s). The Innosilicon A4 Dominator holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ — wins on 2 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Innosilicon A4 Dominator and Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ sit on each measurable spec:

  • Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ 11785614% more hashrate (0.0 vs 33.0 TH/s)
  • Innosilicon A4 Dominator 60% better power draw (1,050 vs 2,600 W)
  • Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ 100% better efficiency (3,750,000.0 vs 78.8 J/TH)
  • Innosilicon A4 Dominator 8% better weight (9,200 vs 10,000 kg)
  • Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ 148% more heat output (3,583 vs 8,871 BTU/hr)
  • Innosilicon A4 Dominator 41% more home mining score (31.0 vs 22.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Innosilicon A4 Dominator

Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+

78.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Innosilicon A4 Dominator or Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Innosilicon A4 Dominator is more profitable at $-2.52/day compared to $-5.04/day for the Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Innosilicon A4 Dominator or Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Innosilicon A4 Dominator vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+: which fits a residential setup better?

The Innosilicon A4 Dominator scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Innosilicon A4 Dominator and Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ on J/TH?

The Innosilicon A4 Dominator runs at 3,750,000.0 J/TH while the Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ runs at 78.8 J/TH — a difference of 3,749,921.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (3,750,000.0 vs 78.8 J/TH).