Innosilicon A8C CryptoMaster vs Bitmain Antminer X3 (220Kh)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Innosilicon A8C CryptoMaster | Specification | Bitmain Antminer X3 (220Kh) |
|---|---|---|
| 80.0 KH/s | Hashrate | 220.0 KH/s |
| 175 W | Power Consumption | 465 W |
| 2,187,500,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 2,113,636,363.6 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 2,640.0 kg | Weight | 5,500.0 kg |
| 597 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,587 BTU/hr |
| 33/100 | Home Mining Score | 34/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Cryptonight | Algorithm | Cryptonight |
| Innosilicon | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Innosilicon A8C CryptoMaster
Bitmain Antminer X3 (220Kh)
Based on BTC price of $76,967 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Bitmain Antminer X3 (220Kh) wins on 2 of 3 factors (efficiency, home mining score). The standout gap is 175% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer X3 (220Kh)'s favour. The Innosilicon A8C CryptoMaster claws back ground on power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Innosilicon A8C CryptoMaster and Bitmain Antminer X3 (220Kh) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer X3 (220Kh) 175% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Innosilicon A8C CryptoMaster 62% better power draw (175 vs 465 W)
- Bitmain Antminer X3 (220Kh) 3% better efficiency (2,187,500,000 vs 2,113,636,364 J/TH)
- Innosilicon A8C CryptoMaster 52% better weight (2,640 vs 5,500 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer X3 (220Kh) 166% more heat output (597 vs 1,587 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer X3 (220Kh) 3% more home mining score (33.0 vs 34.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Innosilicon A8C CryptoMaster | Metric | Bitmain Antminer X3 (220Kh) |
|---|---|---|
| $1,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$0.42 | Daily net profit | -$1.12 |
| -$1,153 | Net after 1 year | -$407 |
| -$1,307 | Net after 2 years | -$815 |
| -$1,460 | Net after 3 years | -$1,222 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer X3 (220Kh)Score: 34/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer X3 (220Kh)2,113,636,363.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Innosilicon A8C CryptoMaster vs Bitmain Antminer X3 (220Kh): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Innosilicon A8C CryptoMaster is more profitable at $-0.42/day compared to $-1.12/day for the Bitmain Antminer X3 (220Kh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Innosilicon A8C CryptoMaster or the Bitmain Antminer X3 (220Kh) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Innosilicon A8C CryptoMaster or Bitmain Antminer X3 (220Kh)?
The Bitmain Antminer X3 (220Kh) scores 34/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 33/100 for the Innosilicon A8C CryptoMaster). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Innosilicon A8C CryptoMaster and Bitmain Antminer X3 (220Kh) on J/TH?
The Innosilicon A8C CryptoMaster runs at 2,187,500,000.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer X3 (220Kh) runs at 2,113,636,363.6 J/TH — a difference of 73,863,636.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 3% better efficiency (2,187,500,000 vs 2,113,636,364 J/TH).
Compare Innosilicon A8C CryptoMaster with...
- Innosilicon A8C CryptoMaster vs Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)
- Innosilicon A8C CryptoMaster vs Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)
- Innosilicon A8C CryptoMaster vs Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)
- Innosilicon A8C CryptoMaster vs Innosilicon A11 Pro
- Innosilicon A8C CryptoMaster vs Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)
- Innosilicon A8C CryptoMaster vs Innosilicon A4 Dominator