Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh vs Goldshell CK-BOX
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh | Specification | Goldshell CK-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| 44.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 1.1 TH/s |
| 460 W | Power Consumption | 215 W |
| 10,454,545.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 204.8 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 2.6 kg | Weight | 2,000.0 kg |
| 1,570 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 734 BTU/hr |
| 69/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Eaglesong |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh
Goldshell CK-BOX
Based on BTC price of $78,226 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell CK-BOX comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better efficiency (10,454,545 vs 205 J/TH). The Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh claws back ground on home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh and Goldshell CK-BOX sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell CK-BOX 2386264% more hashrate (0.0 vs 1.1 TH/s)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 53% better power draw (460 vs 215 W)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 100% better efficiency (10,454,545 vs 205 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh 100% better weight (2.6 vs 2,000.0 kg)
- Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh 114% more heat output (1,570 vs 734 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh 123% more home mining score (69.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh | Metric | Goldshell CK-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| $120 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $190 |
| -$1.10 | Daily net profit | -$0.48 |
| -$523 | Net after 1 year | -$365 |
| -$926 | Net after 2 years | -$539 |
| -$1,329 | Net after 3 years | -$714 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44MhScore: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell CK-BOX204.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh or Goldshell CK-BOX more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell CK-BOX is more profitable at $-0.48/day compared to $-1.10/day for the Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh vs Goldshell CK-BOX: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell CK-BOX at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh or the Goldshell CK-BOX?
The Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Goldshell CK-BOX). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh and Goldshell CK-BOX on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh runs at 10,454,545.5 J/TH while the Goldshell CK-BOX runs at 204.8 J/TH — a difference of 10,454,340.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (10,454,545 vs 205 J/TH).