Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell CK-BOX
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Specification | Goldshell CK-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| 54.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 1.1 TH/s |
| 530 W | Power Consumption | 215 W |
| 9,814,814.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 204.8 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 3.0 kg | Weight | 2,000.0 kg |
| 1,808 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 734 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Eaglesong |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX II
Goldshell CK-BOX
Based on BTC price of $78,205 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell CK-BOX comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, price-performance). The standout gap is 100% better efficiency (9,814,815 vs 205 J/TH) in the Goldshell CK-BOX's favour. That said, the Goldshell AE-BOX II isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins home mining score and noise level. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell CK-BOX diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell CK-BOX 1944344% more hashrate (0.0 vs 1.1 TH/s)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 59% better power draw (530 vs 215 W)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 100% better efficiency (9,814,815 vs 205 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 100% better weight (3.0 vs 2,000.0 kg)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 147% more heat output (1,808 vs 734 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 110% more home mining score (65.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Metric | Goldshell CK-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| $120 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $190 |
| -$1.27 | Daily net profit | -$0.48 |
| -$584 | Net after 1 year | -$365 |
| -$1,049 | Net after 2 years | -$539 |
| -$1,513 | Net after 3 years | -$714 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOX IIScore: 65/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell CK-BOX204.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE-BOX II or the Goldshell CK-BOX?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell CK-BOX is more profitable at $-0.48/day compared to $-1.27/day for the Goldshell AE-BOX II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE-BOX II or the Goldshell CK-BOX better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell CK-BOX at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE-BOX II or Goldshell CK-BOX?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Goldshell CK-BOX). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell CK-BOX on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II runs at 9,814,814.8 J/TH while the Goldshell CK-BOX runs at 204.8 J/TH — a difference of 9,814,610.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (9,814,815 vs 205 J/TH).