Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell KD Box II
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Specification | Goldshell KD Box II |
|---|---|---|
| 37.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 5.0 TH/s |
| 360 W | Power Consumption | 400 W |
| 9,729,729.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 80.0 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 2.3 kg | Weight | 2.0 kg |
| 1,228 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,365 BTU/hr |
| 69/100 | Home Mining Score | 34/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake2s |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX
Goldshell KD Box II
Based on BTC price of $78,226 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell KD Box II edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 13513414% more hashrate (0.0 vs 5.0 TH/s) in the Goldshell KD Box II's favour. The Goldshell AE-BOX holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE-BOX and Goldshell KD Box II actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell KD Box II 13513414% more hashrate (0.0 vs 5.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 10% better power draw (360 vs 400 W)
- Goldshell KD Box II 100% better efficiency (9,729,729.7 vs 80.0 J/TH)
- Goldshell KD Box II 13% better weight (2.3 vs 2.0 kg)
- Goldshell KD Box II 11% more heat output (1,228 vs 1,365 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 103% more home mining score (69.0 vs 34.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Metric | Goldshell KD Box II |
|---|---|---|
| $100 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $236 |
| -$0.86 | Daily net profit | -$0.78 |
| -$415 | Net after 1 year | -$521 |
| -$731 | Net after 2 years | -$805 |
| -$1,046 | Net after 3 years | -$1,090 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOXScore: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell KD Box II80.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE-BOX or the Goldshell KD Box II?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell KD Box II is more profitable at $-0.78/day compared to $-0.86/day for the Goldshell AE-BOX. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE-BOX or Goldshell KD Box II?
The Goldshell AE-BOX is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell KD Box II at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE-BOX or Goldshell KD Box II?
The Goldshell AE-BOX scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 34/100 for the Goldshell KD Box II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell KD Box II: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE-BOX runs at 9,729,729.7 J/TH while the Goldshell KD Box II runs at 80.0 J/TH — a difference of 9,729,649.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (9,729,729.7 vs 80.0 J/TH).