Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell KD Box II
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max | Specification | Goldshell KD Box II |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 5.0 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Power Consumption | 400 W |
| 9,166,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 80.0 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 2.0 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,365 BTU/hr |
| 50/100 | Home Mining Score | 34/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake2s |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max
Goldshell KD Box II
Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Goldshell KD Box II wins on 4 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 100% better efficiency (9,166,666.7 vs 80.0 J/TH). The Goldshell AE Max holds the edge in home mining score and noise level. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell KD Box II sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell KD Box II 1388789% more hashrate (0.0 vs 5.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell KD Box II 88% better power draw (3,300 vs 400 W)
- Goldshell KD Box II 100% better efficiency (9,166,666.7 vs 80.0 J/TH)
- Goldshell KD Box II 85% better weight (13.5 vs 2.0 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max 725% more heat output (11,260 vs 1,365 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Max 47% more home mining score (50.0 vs 34.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE Max | Metric | Goldshell KD Box II |
|---|---|---|
| $870 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $236 |
| -$7.92 | Daily net profit | -$0.78 |
| -$3,761 | Net after 1 year | -$521 |
| -$6,652 | Net after 2 years | -$805 |
| -$9,542 | Net after 3 years | -$1,090 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE MaxScore: 50/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell KD Box II80.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE Max or the Goldshell KD Box II?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell KD Box II is more profitable at $-0.78/day compared to $-7.92/day for the Goldshell AE Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE Max or the Goldshell KD Box II better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell AE Max is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Goldshell KD Box II at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE Max or Goldshell KD Box II?
The Goldshell AE Max scores 50/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 34/100 for the Goldshell KD Box II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell KD Box II: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE Max runs at 9,166,666.7 J/TH while the Goldshell KD Box II runs at 80.0 J/TH — a difference of 9,166,586.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (9,166,666.7 vs 80.0 J/TH).