Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell LT5 Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Specification | Goldshell LT5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 37.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 2.5 GH/s |
| 360 W | Power Consumption | 3,100 W |
| 9,729,729.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,265,306.1 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 2.3 kg | Weight | 8,500.0 kg |
| 1,228 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,577 BTU/hr |
| 69/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Scrypt |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX
Goldshell LT5 Pro
Based on BTC price of $78,124 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Goldshell LT5 Pro wins on 3 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 6522% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Goldshell LT5 Pro's favour. The Goldshell AE-BOX holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE-BOX and Goldshell LT5 Pro diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell LT5 Pro 6522% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 88% better power draw (360 vs 3,100 W)
- Goldshell LT5 Pro 87% better efficiency (9,729,730 vs 1,265,306 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 100% better weight (2.3 vs 8,500.0 kg)
- Goldshell LT5 Pro 761% more heat output (1,228 vs 10,577 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 214% more home mining score (69.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Metric | Goldshell LT5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $100 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $800 |
| -$0.86 | Daily net profit | -$7.44 |
| -$415 | Net after 1 year | -$3,516 |
| -$731 | Net after 2 years | -$6,231 |
| -$1,046 | Net after 3 years | -$8,947 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOXScore: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell LT5 Pro1,265,306.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell LT5 Pro: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE-BOX is more profitable at $-0.86/day compared to $-7.44/day for the Goldshell LT5 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell LT5 Pro: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE-BOX is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell LT5 Pro at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE-BOX or the Goldshell LT5 Pro?
The Goldshell AE-BOX scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell LT5 Pro). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE-BOX and Goldshell LT5 Pro?
The Goldshell AE-BOX runs at 9,729,729.7 J/TH while the Goldshell LT5 Pro runs at 1,265,306.1 J/TH — a difference of 8,464,423.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 87% better efficiency (9,729,730 vs 1,265,306 J/TH).